Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Meshkin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. and I don't think a 3rd relist will help. Sourcing is enough that we're not in BLP territory, but far from keep level. Star Mississippi 13:50, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Meshkin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject has received coverage but the coverage involves passing mentions and small interviews. The subject for this reason fails WP:GNG.

Some coverage exists for the companies where he worked but we need to ignore that per WP:NOTINHERITED.Abhishek0831996 (talk) 06:30, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:24, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:43, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete Per nom, seems to be less about subject and more about relationship to others and companies. Maybe a merge into one of the others, but not a standalone article as he fails WP:GNG.~~ IrishOsita (talk) 02:41, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Struck per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:28, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Only participant besides the nominator is a sockpuppet. Hoping for more editors to weigh in.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:35, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep sourcing to linkedin ins't helping here, but I get a few mentions in an NBC piece, San Diego magazine and a few hits in Gnewspapers. Oaktree b (talk) 12:09, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Far from meeting GNG. Coverage is too trivial. Tessaracter (talk) 06:23, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - very well sourced. However, I still think after 15 years, that I am in the minority view that school board members and superintendents can be notable when they are involved in a major scandal. Bearian (talk) 22:39, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.