Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brexit's consequences on Mauritius

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 22:43, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brexit's consequences on Mauritius

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced article. Very much reads like a personal essay or reflection on a topic. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 21:41, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 21:41, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mauritius-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 21:41, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. _pseudonym Jake Brockman ^talk 21:41, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Some sort of essay. WP:NOT. --Tagishsimon (talk) 22:13, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails a bunch of WP:NOT, especially the essay portion. SportingFlyer T·C 01:30, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all the above. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 08:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. this is clearly an essay. It's not impossible that there is something here that could be useful at Economy of Mauritius but more likely is that the essay's sources will be useful for adding encyclopaedic content there. Thryduulf (talk) 12:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this is clearly an essay agree with all aboveVViking_TalkEdits 21:36, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Per all Above, Fails WP:NOT Alex-h (talk) 17:56, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as per all of the above.TH1980 (talk) 01:33, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Another personal work about an unworthy subject. -The Gnome (talk) 19:04, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fully agree with above points. Very similar case to the essay-like article discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A potential "business as usual" Brexit ? which seems to have been created by the same user. Dunarc (talk) 19:45, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.