Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Allen (soccer)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Happy to restore to draft upon request. czar 03:40, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Brandon Allen (soccer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Concern was that the article fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. PROD contested by the articles creator without providing a reason. – Michael (talk) 03:01, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I believe Brandon Allen (soccer) deserves to be a page due to the fact that the player in question signed his first professional contract. He may not have played in any professional games yet, but that is because the season has not started. All information regarding the player have been properly referenced. DBonino (talk) 04:02, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's all just routine coverage. Signing a professional contract doesn't satisfy the notability guidelines. So as of right now, this article should be deleted. – Michael (talk) 07:33, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – Michael (talk) 03:03, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick tcs 04:38, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick tcs 04:38, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick tcs 04:38, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.