Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bogey device

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:04, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bogey device

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NAD. This term seems to be a non-notable technical term, and the article is not well referenced, only citing a PDF file on the term from a tube testing business. Not sure it meets the notability requirements. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:50, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This seems worthwhile. I've added half a dozen references to the article. The concept is clearly in wide use in its domain, being used by different companies and journals on the subject. I'd note, however, that the article may not be well named; the author has created redirects for 'bogey/bogie tube', but perhaps 'bogey value' (for parameters) would be the best target as the central concept. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:16, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article actually looks much better now than it did when I nominated it for deletion, and thank you for finding the sources. I am fine with Keeping and Moving to "Bogey Value". TonyBallioni (talk) 21:02, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.