Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blu Cigs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 06:22, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blu Cigs

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertising. A PROD tag was removed by an anon with no comment. The only Google news hits for this product are webwire and officialwire, both Press Release republishers. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 21:20, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 22:34, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 22:34, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is no notable content. A news search which showed one real hit which was a local story which isn't enough to establish notability. If there were some useful content, then I might have suggested merging with Electronic cigarette. Novangelis (talk) 22:53, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete An interesting product. But insufficiently notable. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:59, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.