Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billie (company)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:08, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Billie (company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Company brochure article. Fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. Moved to draft, but moved out by author. scope_creepTalk 10:14, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 10:55, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 10:55, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 10:55, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 14:47, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 14:47, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Article was written by a promotional account that has since been indef'd. scope_creepTalk 10:43, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:SPIP, none of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP HighKing++ 18:08, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete subjects lacks the in-depth, independent coverage needed to meet WP:NCORP and WP:SIGCOV; press releases, funding announcements, and passing mentions wont cut it. Some sources that announce the company's intent to combat the pink tax are speculative in tone and based on WP:PRIMARY information, and thus do not confer undue notability on the subject.--SamHolt6 (talk) 18:44, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.