Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Britt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:17, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Britt

Amwaycruft/advertisement/NN; see also Quixtar Motivational Organization et. al Paul 01:07, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete with the rest, per nom. Make them go away. Fan1967 01:18, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all. Non-notable, unsourced. Not encyclopedic. Gwernol 01:25, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom Hobbeslover 01:53, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as failing WP:BIO Bucketsofg✐ 02:31, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nn-bio, WP:CRUFT. --Ter e nc e Ong 02:36, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Wikipedia isn't a good place for this... The Quixtar Wiki or the Quixtar article may be better. Quixtar discussion even has a proposed rewrite to change the article that no one has commented on. Gallwapa 02:49, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Sorry Guy 05:38, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- does not assert notablity outside his own limited field. Reads as vanity -- Simon Cursitor 07:19, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. DarthVad e r 09:56, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Srik e it^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 11:19, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. ProhibitOnions 11:43, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete blatant vanispamcruftisement Just zis Guy you know? 14:01, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. Beno1000 15:03, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.