Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beatrix Lang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pittenweem witches. History is under the redirect if anything needs to be added. Star Mississippi 14:39, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Beatrix Lang

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Good faith creation; however, subject fails WP:BIO1E and WP:NOTWHOSWHO. Merge relevant info into Pittenweem witches. It's me... Sallicio!^{$\color {Red}\oplus$} 14:53, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, History, and Scotland. Skynxnex (talk) 15:16, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to the witches article, for the whole two sentences of text. Oaktree b (talk) 19:18, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Pittenweem witches, and Create redirects (or hatnotes or dab page entries) from the many variations of her name which are listed in the lead (3x3=9, so 8 extra entries needed), and Add bolded names to lead for Janet Cornfoot (merge already proposed) and the other three women if named, who all need the same treatment. Compare Pendle witches, which has many incoming redirects from their names. PamD 07:43, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

At present there isn't even a redirect from the spelling Beatrix Layng which is used in the lead of Pittenweem witches. Please, people, remember to make redirects from names of significant people in articles. PamD 07:48, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Pittenweem witches. There is nothing in the Beatrix Lang article that is not already comprehensively covered in the main article. Perhaps someone should also check the Lang article for plagiarism/copyright problems? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23EE:1531:28B4:4DD0:83FB:C35D:2BDA (talk) 08:06, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Pittenweem witches which already has more information about Beatrix Layng than the Beatrix Lang article, and implement the fixes to the Pittenweem witches article recommended by PamD (including bolding and other redirects). Cielquiparle (talk) 13:35, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - I would agree that the place for information on the subject is the Pittenweem witches article rather than a separate one and would support the proposal for the other redirects suggested. Dunarc (talk) 21:28, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect into the Pittenweem witches article. Coldupnorth (talk) 22:46, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.