Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BeHappy2Day

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BeHappy2Day

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notably, Lacks creditable citations, & kind of reads like an advertisement. Krj373^{*(talk), *(contrib)} 16:58, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I tried searching for anything about the site but only found their ads. The number of users doesn't agree with Alexa's statistics about the site's unpopularity, and we all know how dating sites push made up user accounts all the time just like Ashley Madison did. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 18:28, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not a notable website (all citations are not from reliable sources), and reads like a WP:PROMO. FuriouslySerene (talk) 18:51, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reliable sources to support contention that this is a popular or well-known dating website. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:13, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This article is involved with some sockpuppetry with a now blocked paid editor, so I'd recommend salting this if/when it's deleted, as there have been attempts in the past to recreate deleted articles. Doing it after the deletion would just save some energy. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:31, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.