Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barabàn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Owen× ☎ 19:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Barabàn

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. Boleyn (talk) 13:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Italy. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 14:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nom. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 14:43, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Strong delete~~, you probably should have proposed this article for deletion. Mach61 (talk) 15:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Mach61 is that still the case with the sources linked in the comments below? Broc (talk) 16:56, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's possible for an artist to have notable works without being notable themselves, but the two sources Broc posted appear to show the band meeting NMUSIC. FWIW I remember finding absolutely nothing in my BEFORE search, hence the strong delete vote, but clearly others have been more fruitful in their searches. Consider my vote withdrawn. Mach61 (talk) 17:03, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I don't know anything about the Italian non-metal music press, but their work has been reviewed by at least two paper magazines. Geschichte (talk) 18:11, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per by previous post. No sign of a WP:BEFORE above. Geschichte (talk) 08:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Geschichte - they are regionally notable. Llajwa (talk) 21:26, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per above. Only regionally notable. A couple more sources: [1] [2] --Broc (talk) 16:54, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 16:34, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 14:09, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep enough sources seem to be present here. AryKun (talk) 09:07, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.