Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayesha Erotica

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 09:25, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ayesha Erotica

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirected and PROD contested multiple times. Suspected WP:PROMO. Fails WP:MUSICBIO. Jalen Folf (talk) 08:23, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and California. Jalen Folf (talk) 08:23, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is an unreferenced biography of a living person, which is in itself a compelling reason to delete the article. In its current form, the article says, I'm not a public figure, and I do not want to be an internet celebrity. Whether or not this unreferenced quote is accurate makes no difference. The very existence of this unreferenced quote in a Biography of a living person is another compelling reason to delete the article. Cullen328 (talk) 08:42, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:48, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As a completely unsourced BLP this should be an easy delete. Side note: I just reverted the blatant vandalism/PA on this page by the SPA that turned this redirect back into an article, and would advise keeping an eye out for disruption of this AfD. Blue Edits (talk) 15:19, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Blue Edits: In response to the sidenote, the user is now blocked for WP:NOTHERE. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:56, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment songs have coverage on NPR [1], which I was not expecting. I think we could cobble together enough of an article here. Oaktree b (talk) 15:50, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read that article? It's a one-paragraph blurb about a song by someone else who has merely collaborated with Ms. Erotica a few times in different songs that are not named therein. No relevance for Ms. Erotica's notability. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 01:59, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oaktree b the coverage you cite here is about someone else. She is merely name checked.ShelbyMarion (talk) 11:12, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's simply confirmation she exists, likely not useful for GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 12:50, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, clear failure to meet WP:GNG. Really does look like a promo puff piece. — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 20:19, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - A singer who released a few songs and now seems to be trying to generate publicity by not making music. I found some discussions about this in Twitter, Reddit, etc. with a few longer blog analyses by nobodies, and they are probably all part of a self-promotion attempt by a wannabe influencer. The rest of the world, including reliable music media, has not noticed. QUOTE OF THE DAY: "at the time I quit, I was the only one who knew I quit." --- Rodney Dangerfield. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 01:57, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Clearly fails to meet WP:GNG, entirely unsourced, and appears promotion. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:34, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:GNG, it’s unsourced. Equine-man (talk) 21:44, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and unsourced.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:17, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.