Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artur Ustinov

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 04:44, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Artur Ustinov

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unexceptional, non-notable, recently qualified lawyer. Cabayi (talk) 11:57, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 11:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 11:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:TOOSOON no indication of notability at present, may be notable in future if he has high profile cases but just having one high profile case is not enough Atlantic306 (talk) 18:00, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG.FITINDIA (talk) 18:56, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable lawyer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:32, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Fitindia: Also fails BIO and LAWYER. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 01:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as my nomination.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:27, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.