Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AppMaster
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. czar ⨹ 19:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
- AppMaster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable product from company of the same ilk. The provided sources are bogus and don't even mention the company or this product. Only thing remotely notable is a blog post from the developers of Lookout detailing its flaws[1](includes additional links). In this diff [2], to a seperate but related article, the author includes a Tumblr URL as source but, this particular URL is only exposed to the blog owner; while subdomains are instead used on Tumblr for public facing content (eg staff
- Delete - Looks like advertising. NickCT (talk) 15:01, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Clearly promotional. Deb (talk) 15:37, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as clearing promotional. –Davey2010 • (talk) 15:57, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete- Advertisement.Pgold009 (talk) 16:01, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete Very promotional. --AmaryllisGardener talk 16:29, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Promotional and not notable. Harsh (talk) 19:41, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Harsh (talk) 19:42, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Pure Promotional article.Lakun.patra (talk) 05:15, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.