Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Shaw (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:34, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Shaw

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage in reliable sources. -- Irn (talk) 17:22, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 17:32, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 17:32, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 17:32, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Let me add to the nominator's rationale: NO coverage in secondary sources. Furthermore, all the citations in the article are primary sources. The consensus on the first AFD was to keep if notability could be verified. It cannot be verified. Yoninah (talk) 18:13, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Big synagogue, popular rabbi, tribute page. Carrite (talk) 01:15, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I added some sources on the talk page. I don't have the time to spruce up the article and make a judgement. Not sure on the delete. Joe407 (talk) 08:49, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I believe he can be classified as an author for his creation of the 60 for 60 book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gausie (talk • contribs) 12:24, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- He is certainly an author, but is he notable? Are there book reviews or newspaper interviews that cite his book? Yoninah (talk) 13:12, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, causa sui (talk) 17:17, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:55, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete i've generally supported pages for rabbis who are heads of prominent congregations, but he's just Community Rabbi at one; their chief rabbi, Mendel Lew, is the one who probably should have an article. DGG ( talk ) 04:13, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.