Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Stiller's Breast

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 15:42, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Amy Stiller's Breast

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. The one reference in the article is broken, and a google search comes up with nothing beyond wikipedia articles and IMDB, which isn't enough. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:16, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 15:06, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - Google brings nothing up for me other than IMDB which isn't a reliable source. –Davey2010^Talk 20:47, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. JDDJS (talk) 23:48, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:37, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:37, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Rather obscure film with multiple searches (News, Books, browser, highbeam and thefreelibrary) finding nothing aside from one result. I believe the one award isn't enough to save this article. SwisterTwister talk 20:02, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not enough reliable sources cover it to meet WP:GNG Snuggums (talk / edits) 13:52, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.