Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amar y temer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎ . Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:25, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Amar y temer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be notable, nothing found in a BEFORE. Tagged for notability since 2012.

PROD removed with "de-prod. clearly notably, check spanish wiki", which I had already previously done...and, while that article is more detailed than this English one, there are ZERO references there as well. DonaldD23 talk to me 23:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Spain. DonaldD23 talk to me 23:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:53, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The only hit in Google Book Search was a trivial mention in ISBN 9781479893881. But there are more web results, including [1] (El Universal (Cartagena)) and [2] (some random blog). The eswiki article also said it won one es:Premios India Catalina award and was nominated for others. My Spanish isn't good enough to work on this (and I have found no non-trivial mentions in English-language media), but I think there is sufficient coverage for an article. Walt Yoder (talk) 00:07, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete per nom, Fails GNG and [[WP:RPRGM]. Sources found are promo, primary, database, etc, nothing from IS RS SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. // Timothy :: talk 00:40, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:57, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Additional SIGCOV: [3]. Going to add the sources available so far. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:16, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging @Donaldd23 and @TimothyBlue to take a look at my work. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:23, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep following improvements made. – Meena • 11:01, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment on sources:

[4], [5] (barely), [6] These appear to be IS RS SIGCOV. They address the subject (the show) directly and indepth (it provides significant, not trivial, information about the subject).
[7] this looks like an unreviewed opinion post from a reader, if I'm wrong let me know; Fails RS.
[8], article is about another subject. The only thing I can find here is the sentence, "On the other hand, Amar y temer -with Diana Hoyos- will remain on the air, at midnight" while the article discusses schedule changes. Fails SIGCOV.
[9], name mentioned in list. Fails SIGCOV.

3/6, but three IS RS with SIGCOV will pass GNG. // Timothy :: talk 15:37, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep switched from delete based on article improvement. // Timothy :: talk 15:37, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.