Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanullah Nezami

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR (non-admin closure) —UY Scuti ^Talk 16:57, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Amanullah Nezami

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Some notability is existing, but reference I've found are all based on one article "Afghan Bollywood fan spent millions to have largest collection of Hindi movies". Not sure if this is enough for inclusion. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 19:22, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More than 5 various news sources have been added showcasing enough validity - plus one coming from Google News itself. Also, there was an the Hour-long documentary produced and distributed about his life on the prestigious Sahara TV, the trailer of which has been linked. Unknown Master (talk)Unknown Master —Preceding undated comment added 00:50, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:48, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:48, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:49, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per being a WP:BLP1E, and having coverage for his accomplishment of spending lots of money to collect lots of movies. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 13:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Several newspaper articles commenting on this person. Also, there is a documentary made on him. Ample references to establish notability. I do not think WP:BLP1E applies here, since this is not exactly one event, rather a trait/characteristic of the person. --Dwaipayan (talk) 15:14, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:31, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.