Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Mito

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Supreme Constitutional Court of Egypt. Bishonen | talk 16:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmed Mito

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. Mito's sole claim to notability is as the designer of a notable building, the Supreme Constitutional Court of Egypt but there is no citation to verify this fact, either in Mito's article or in the article about the court building. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not pass notability guidelines for an architect.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:59, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Supreme Constitutional Court of Egypt. Unscintillating (talk) 23:19, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment @Unscintillating: I would agree except there is no source to verify the claim that Mito actually designed this building. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:06, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - All five of the top hits on Google books look likely, but here are two that were clear in the snippet:

Archis. Stichting Wonen. 2002. Retrieved 2017-02-25. ...the Supreme Court of Egypt, designed by Ahmed Mito, employs features of Pharaonic architecture but with different proportions.

Paul Ayoub-Geday; Mandy McClure (2002). Egypt Almanac. Egypto-file. ISBN 978-977-5893-02-4. Retrieved 2017-02-25. Completed in 2001, the Supreme Constitutional Court of Egypt, designed by Ahmed Mito, places emphasis on employing features of ancient Egyptian architecture while producing a quasi-new form.

Unscintillating (talk) 15:42, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment OK. In that case, I'd support a redirect. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:57, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.