Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/After Shave (1999 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unanimity that all three films fail WP:NFILM. Just Chilling (talk) 22:51, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

After Shave (1999 film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Three completely unsourced articles about short films with no credible claim to passing WP:NFILM. As always, every film is not handed an automatic notability freebie just because the director happens to have a BLP: the notability test for a film requires things like winning or being nominated for noteworthy film awards, and/or being sourceable to enough evidence of reliable source coverage about it (e.g. actual film reviews by professional film critics) to clear WP:GNG. But none of these three films have either of those things at all, and they're not exempted from having to have notability claims just because they're available on YouTube either. Mitrani's feature films ain't going anywhere, because they all clear NFILM much better even if the articles technically still need improvement, but his pre-Igor Rizzi short films just don't clear the notability bar at all. Bearcat (talk) 22:47, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 22:47, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 22:47, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Howwever, @Bearcat: there only appears to be two films in the nom, not three, with the first and third films listed twice. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 05:53, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. I had changed the third film in the "find sources" link, but forgot to change it in the "la" template. Bearcat (talk) 13:29, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 14:53, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. All three films fail WP:NFILM for the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources, film reviews and awards. In my searches, they only appear as a passing mention in this article about Noël Mitrani [1]. Nothing to merge here as every and each one of these are unsourced. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 13:14, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.