Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adem Atay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:10, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adem Atay

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Subject doesn't meet WP:NFOOTBALL as hasn't played or managed in a senior international match or a match between two teams from fully professional leagues. As for WP:GNG, there doesn't seem to be much coverage of the subject in independent reliable sources, per a quick search. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:49, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:49, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:49, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:49, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:49, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 23:12, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Surprising how old the article is. Fails NFOOTY in first instance. As for GNG, being an academy coach is per se not significant and I doubt if the necessary coverage exists. I thought about draftifying but I don't think there's enough potential to justify it. No Great Shaker (talk) 12:31, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 18:19, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom. Fails WP:GNG, unless someone is better at Google searching than I am. GauchoDude (talk) 13:50, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.