Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acer N series
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Sandstein 09:23, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Acer N series (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significant coverage for this PDA line. SL93 (talk) 15:09, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV. Excelse (talk) 19:39, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - Following improvement article demonstrates WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV on online resources alone let alone offline resources which were typical of its period.Djm-leighpark (talk) 11:29, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Note that the article was significantly expanded after being nominated for deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:12, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Relisting comment: Note that the article was significantly expanded after being nominated for deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:12, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:29, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:29, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep as per WP:HEY as the article now has many new references including significant coverage in multiple reliable sources so that WP:GNG is passed thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 16:08, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:HEY as sufficient sourcing as been provided to pass GNG. Some direct links aren't working, but things like 2nd pages have been archived and so provide indirect links. Nosebagbear (talk) 20:48, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.