Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ABBYY PDF Transformer (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to ABBYY. Mr.Z-man 01:38, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ABBYY PDF Transformer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

advertising The Banner talk 21:51, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 00:29, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and Redirect to ABBYY - Software article with some RS independent refs. The PC Magazine review in particular is significant coverage, and a few of the other reviews are probably RS. A merge to the company that developed the software makes sense because both articles are relatively short, especially once promotional language is removed, and the ABBYY page already has a section for various software products.Dialectric (talk) 17:56, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as above. There's not a lot left after the advertising is pared down, but enough for a mention at the company's article. Ivanvector (talk) 16:34, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge selectively to ABBYY–ABBYY PDF Transformer. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:40, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as above. The essay at Wikipedia:Notability (software)#Inclusion does not suggest a basis for an independent article, neither does the paucity of information. --Bejnar (talk) 18:59, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.