Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3BG Supply Co.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

3BG Supply Co.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional, fails WP:NCORP. Coverage is mostly routine (funding, acquisitions); or a listing without significant coverage. There's a single source I would consider borderline, a profile in an industry publication (Industrial Distribution), but that seems like it. ~ A412 ^talk! 01:51, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Indiana. ~ A412 ^talk! 01:51, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:33, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails notability guidelines; all sources on Google shows up routine news coverage with nothing indepth. Toadette ^{(Let's discuss together!)} 15:15, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:10, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: PROMOtional article with no meaningful history. DrowssapSMM 01:00, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.