Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 South Shore Town Cup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:45, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2014 South Shore Town Cup

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article on the South Shore Town Cup was deleted for failing WP:N, so I don't see how this could survive. Briancua (talk) 17:20, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No notability whatsoever. BenLinus1214 (talk) 18:38, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I'm really not seeing any criteria for keeping this on WP. NickCT (talk) 18:44, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There is no need to delete this. If you feel it lacks certain information then fix it yourself. Stop going around proposing everything for deletion. Aidan721 03:19, 6 December 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aidan721 (talk • contribs)

Delete: That's not the way things work on Wikipedia, and looking at the various conflicts you've been involved with in the last few weeks on your talk page, it's troubling that you appear not to be making much of an effort to learn certain key Wikipedia policies and guidelines, or to follow them when they're pointed out to you. The reason that this article was proposed for deletion was simply that it doesn't qualify under Wikipedia guidelines for inclusion. For a general article, it would need to qualify under WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV and WP:ROUTINE. For a hockey article, local amateur and children's competitions are never considered notable unless they qualify under the GNG. In any event, as per Wikipedia's deletion policy, it's not up to others to "fix" articles to your liking; it's up to those who wish to save the articles to do so. I urge you, as others have, to read up on these guidelines, which will better inform you as to what articles are likely to qualify. Alternately, you could turn your attention to improving existing articles instead of creating new ones. Ravenswing 03:51, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Fails WP:Notability (events) as there is no lasting significance, significant impact over a wide region, or wide-ranging reporting in reliable sources. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 04:55, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Would making this the main page for the tournament be any better as I could add information from all past years. Just an idea so let me know. Aidan721 15:32, 6 December 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aidan721 (talk • contribs)

No. The tournament itself isn't notable enough for an article, which is why that article was deleted. Happily, those looking for information about the tournament can always refer to its own website. Ravenswing 18:56, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. If this children's sporting event as a whole is not notable, any individual iteration of it isn't going to be notable. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:44, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable event -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 22:06, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.