User talk:Xyz12345678910

January 2013

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Ivan Fisher without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jim1138 (talk) 07:12, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am mwinog2777. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Ivan Fisher without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. There is a three revert rule, and any further revert will be reported. If done by anyone anonymous, will still be reported. Thanks,Mwinog2777 (talk) 17:17, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

You claim the suspension is interim. Nevertheless, a suspension is a suspension. It is now in place. I would ask you to not revert again. There is clear evidence of the suspension.Mwinog2777 (talk) 06:26, 15 January 2013 (UTC)current[reply]

I would like to settle this dispute with you. Would it be OK to add the word "interim" and call it an interim suspension, pending final resolution??Mwinog2777 (talk) 06:35, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]