Jump to content

User talk:Viajero

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive 1
Archive 2
Archive 3

Archive 4
Archive 5
Archive 6

Archive 7
Archive 8
Archive 9

Add new message


Precious

[edit]

French opera

Thank you for quality articles such as Evo Morales and Les Troyens, for starting stubs of French opera in the early days, such as Manon in 2003, for "I admire Wikipedia for its communal spirit and its non-hierarchical organization", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:09, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Three years ago, you were recipient no. 1544 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:08, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 special circular

[edit]
Icon of a white exclamation mark within a black triangle
Administrators must secure their accounts

The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:15, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

[edit]

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security โ€” that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Tito Schipa 3.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Erasmus Prize winners has been nominated for discussion

[edit]
Category:Erasmus Prize winners, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:35, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

[edit]

Information icon Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. โ€”โ€‰JJMC89 bot 00:11, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

[edit]

Information icon Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. โ€”โ€‰JJMC89 bot 00:03, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

[edit]

Information icon Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.

Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. โ€” xaosflux Talk 00:08, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

[edit]
Precious
Four years!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:33, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for James Ridgeway

[edit]

On 15 February 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article James Ridgeway, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. โ€”Bagumba (talk) 15:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Falangist" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Falangist. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 7#Falangist until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿค๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿบ๐ช๐‘ค๐’†๐“‡๐Ÿท๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฅ๐Ÿœ๐“บ๐”ด๐•–๐–—๐Ÿฐ (๐—๐—ฎ๐˜ญ๐™ ) 20:03, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Puerto Rican people has been nominated for renaming

[edit]
Category:Puerto Rican people has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 14:25, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Banana Republicans for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Banana Republicans is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banana Republicans until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 10:05, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article Sam Smith (journalist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not very notable person. Limited coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andrevan@ 02:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sam Smith (journalist) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sam Smith (journalist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Smith (journalist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Andrevan@ 03:44, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Evo Morales

[edit]

Evo Morales has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 22:20, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]