User talk:VENUvg007
Welcome!
[edit]Hi VENUvg007! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! SUN EYE 1 15:30, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
VENUvg007, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi VENUvg007! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 30 April 2021 (UTC) |
May 2021
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Dravidar Kazhagam, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. SUN EYE 1 15:20, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Discretionary Sanctions Notice
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
SUN EYE 1 15:25, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Avarna. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. aeschylus (talk) 16:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Avarna, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Avarna was changed by VENUvg007 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.905281 on 2021-05-28T16:50:11+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
What's wrong? I am providing original information. VENUvg007 (talk) 16:52, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
May 2023
[edit] Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Sri Vaishnavism, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 03:12, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Pandya dynasty. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:17, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tirumala Nayaka, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Tirumala Nayaka was changed by VENUvg007 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861277 on 2023-05-26T12:40:24+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:40, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
- How is it vandalism? I just want to add the historical truths. VENUvg007 (talk) 14:07, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
June 2023
[edit]
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Tamil Brahmin . Next edit summary like that one gets you reported for a block. Meters (talk) 18:19, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- wikipedia is shit. Clearly someone with an agenda has included an intention misinformation. And the citing they have provided isn't reliable and valid. And I am being banned for trying to change this. VENUvg007 (talk) 09:38, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe you should read what I actually wrote. I'll ask for a block the next time you leave an offensive edit summary like that. Meters (talk) 05:15, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
- You can go ahead blocking me. Wikipedia is crap source of information anyways. I have cross checked the book cited claiming tholkappiyar is brahmin in 'notable people' section. The book nowhere mentions he was a brahmin but rather only says tholkappiyam is pre Aryan literature. It's a baseless misinformation. I don't know who you are or where you are from, but if the misinformation suits your agenda, so be it. VENUvg007 (talk) 02:39, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Enough. This has been explained to you. Get consensus on the talk page for your change or leave it alone. Politely make your case on the talk page and maybe other editors will agree. Making personal attacks (accusing editors of having agendas or intentionally supporting misinformation) and uncivil edit summaries such as your "evil cunts" is not helping. Keep it up and I'll ask for a block. Meters (talk) 03:02, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- You can go ahead blocking me. Wikipedia is crap source of information anyways. I have cross checked the book cited claiming tholkappiyar is brahmin in 'notable people' section. The book nowhere mentions he was a brahmin but rather only says tholkappiyam is pre Aryan literature. It's a baseless misinformation. I don't know who you are or where you are from, but if the misinformation suits your agenda, so be it. VENUvg007 (talk) 02:39, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe you should read what I actually wrote. I'll ask for a block the next time you leave an offensive edit summary like that. Meters (talk) 05:15, 27 June 2023 (UTC)