User talk:Too Cool

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Too Cool! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, Please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- Kukini 06:57, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

The above is a welcome, nothing more

All I was doing was merely a welcome and links to help you be successful here. Don't forget to make edit summaries with your edits as well. Best, Kukini 07:03, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Deletion policy

Wikipedia:Talk_page#User_talk_pages

Too Cool

WP:NUH

See WP:NUH for the reply to your post. Tom H 18:46, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy and prod tags on your userpage

I removed these because they were causing your userpage to be listed as a candidate for deletion. NawlinWiki 14:27, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

okay, dude, keep up the good work!!! --Too Cool 08:01, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

UPWA

umm sorry but i didnt create that article!!!! i dont even know wat promotion that is!?? --- Paulley 07:22, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

lol get the administator who deleted the article to find its edit history if you dont believe me but i didnt create that article ---- Paulley

Umm if you have forgotten about it already why did you make this edit to my talk page yesterday --- Paulley 09:12, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Protection tag

Please do not put {{sprotect}} and other protection tags on pages that are not protected. If you continue to do so, it will be construed as vandalism and be dealt with as such. --Nlu (talk) 05:28, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

oh, im sorry i didnt know an article had to BE protected to put that tag on, i thought that to REQUEST an article to BE protected we had to put that tag on!!! so, tell me how do i get an article to get protected? we need one on the Boxing article its being vandalised almost each and every day. --Too Cool 08:52, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting back to me. For requesting protection, go to WP:RFPP. --Nlu (talk) 15:32, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

This is in regards to your edits on the Animax article. I completely and wholeheartedly welcome any useful contributions all good-meaning editors wish to make, but I would just like to request that you follow the Wikipedia style of format per Wikipedia:Manual of style, and add authentified references in regards to any particular details or claims you make per Wikipedia:Verifiability. Due to your edits, the format of the article was unfortunately changed (for example, Southeast Asia is not part of Japan, but you added it as such, and the Latin and North America sections belong in the History section per the Wiki format). If you have any comments about these policies, please feel free to make them on their respective talk pages! Ganryuu (talk) 18:08, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't edit others' comments

Don't edit others' comments (or delete them, for that matter). That is called unacceptable behavior and will get you blocked. Thanks. --Geniac 13:40, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The following qoute has been extracted from Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines

The purpose of a Wikipedia talk page is to provide space for editors to discuss changes to its associated article or project page.

and i would like to point out that im NOT an article, thank you!!!

a person does indeed have the right to delete messages on his OWN talk page please see -

Wikipedia:Talk_page#Etiquette

it says- Most users treat their user talk pages like regular talk pages, and archive the contents periodically to a personal subpage — either when the page gets too large, on a regular schedule, or when they take a wikivacation. Others delete comments after they have responded to them.

and i have indeed responded to them, three times, already!!!

and please do NOT try to threaten me!!! --Too Cool 13:55, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"i have indeed responded to them, three times, already!!!"

Do you mean here? Could you provide links to the other two replies, please?
"please do NOT try to threaten me!!!" I apologise if you thought I was threatening you; I did not intend to come across that way. --Geniac 14:20, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

and isnt this kinda STUPID asking why, to show the OTHER two reoplies, especially when they were underneath each other!!! --Too Cool 14:28, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand removing comments after you've replied to them, but please don't remove parts of others' comments, in article talk pages or your own talk page; that misrepresents what people say. Also, please do not call people "stupid"; that is incivil. Thanks. --Geniac 14:50, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

and WHO was calling YOU stupid? i said that THIS question and "threat" is stupid!!! ;] - Too Cool 15:13, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AMA

Hi, I'm going to be your advocate. Addhoc 17:37, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, your interpretation of Wikipedia guidance in regard to user talk pages is substantially correct, however regarding the current debate, could I suggest you discontinue. Addhoc 17:50, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks anyways, whatever!!! --Too Cool 06:49, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The notable anime article

I was going to suggest the deletion of that article anyway because there was no way to determine what should be on that list (usually any sort of "List of notable _____" is deleted). Also, you shouldn't remove tags from articles without addressing the issue. Oh, and don't put a "credits" section on articles or their talk pages- see Wikipedia:Ownership of articles for more. --Wafulz 13:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Despite your best intentions, as a community we decided that the list of anime wasn't doing anything different from the category- it was simply growing infinitely and indiscriminately. Have you seen the deletion discussion? --Wafulz 13:45, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're working under the assumption that the only reason it was deleted was because it was too long- this is incorrect. It was deleted because it was not maintainable, it was an indiscriminate list of information, and because it wasn't doing anything that Category:Anime wasn't already doing.

Check out these policies/guidelines:

Redirect on my talk page

~~Don't throw in redirects on my talk page. This is vandalism and is frowned upon. If you want to experiment use the sandbox or create an experimental subpage--Wafulz 14:06, 26 September 2006 (UTC)~~[reply]

HEY, HEY, hey it was an ACCIDENT, i wanted to press my signature button on top, but accidently pressed the redirect button, theyre almsot next to each. I NEVER VADALISE, thank you!!! and DIDNT i tell you i dont wanna talk about anime for a while. HEY, dont think were friends just cuz we had a little chat for two minutes!!! --Too Cool 14:11, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, nevermind. Thought I don't how this had anything to do with anime. Also, please be a little more polite in discussions- there's no need to be patronizing. --Wafulz 14:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

K-1 World Grand Prix 2002

You should provide the necessary context for this article to keep it from getting deleted. Also, lists are created using * (for plain lists) or # (for numbered lists) at the beginning of the line. ~ trialsanderrors 07:40, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Preview

I would like to thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again. --Wafulz 20:36, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Do not use sock-puppets to avoid your problematic editing history. You have clearly continued the same innapropriate activities that got you blocked in the first place. Keep it up and your primary account will simply be banned permanently. You can run, but you can't hide. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 16:38, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock reviewed|so, youve blocked me! but do you have practically any good reason for blocking me? and you say you might ban me permanently, but exactly when would my current ban be lifted anyway? You have banned me for no good reason, this is ridiculous. And you say im using sock puppets, well this is what wikipedia's article says about sock-puppets- A sock puppet is an additional username used by a Wikipedian who edits under more than one name, and i am absolutley not using more than one account, i am under new connection, i got new internet connection, pc, service, etc, so you cant just ban me for that. You are being absolutley unjust banning me for no good reason, you ought to lift my ban.|decline=You have misread the policy on sockpuppets. Please reread the entire policy, specifically about not using sockpuppets abusively and not using them to circumvent blocks. Thanks for your contributions in the past and goodbye from Wikipedia. -- ➨ ЯEDVERS 20:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)}[reply]

Your user name or IP address has been blocked from editing. You were blocked by Jeffrey O. Gustafson for the following reason (see our blocking policy): Transperent sockpuppet of decidedly problematic and previously blocked User:T00C00L Your IP address is 203.76.96.12.

{unblock|so, am i just being banned for a sock puppet? and you guys are sayin im using this account to circumvent block of my previous account, well, my previous account was never permanently banned, it was only banned for like five days. ive done lots and Lots of contributions here and i wanna do more, i work on wikipedia around two hours everyday, and i never try to vandalise and, when was i so objectionally rude? i personally dont see the reson i have been banned here? id get it, if there was a mistake i made i couldv been blocked for a couple of days or so, but, why have i been banned for life? is there any reason to do this, im not evn getting an explanation here. My ban has been absolutely unjust. }

I'm going to unblock you. Although WP:SOCK is serious business, and I think you might have created this account to circumvent your Aug. 25 block (though you made no edits in that period, possibly because Wikipedia:Autoblocking was working), that block is long past now, and you have never used both accounts at the same time. Users are allowed to change usernames, and I think your choice to do so is sensible. However, I'm going to add a link to your userpage identifying your previous account: like Jeffrey said, you don't get to do this to hide your prior bad actions. Your previous account is now indefinitely blocked, but it hadn't been before, and I think your creation of this account was a factor in that block. I do want to mention that this complaint is what prompted Jeffrey to block you ... and those complaints are serious. You could be blocked for that kind of behavior... but that complaint was 2 weeks old by the time you were blocked, and I don't see the same abuse in your recent activity. From now on, try to use edit summaries, don't remove warnings from your talk page, be WP:CIVIL, and obey the 3-revert rule. Mango juice^talk 12:52, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock under review. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 13:25, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Block affirmed and upheld. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 07:26, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Altimet

A tag has been placed on Altimet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:45, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Teh Tarik Crew

A tag has been placed on Teh Tarik Crew requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 19:23, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]