User talk:TalgoKL

TalgoKL, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi TalgoKL! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Soni (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Kachwaha

The issues raised by your edits have been discussed exhaustively in the past. You were bold in trying yet again to go against what reliable sources say and, per WP:BRD, it is you who now needs to find a way to gain consensus for your changes. - Sitush (talk) 09:20, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Please discuss this issue at talk page of the article. TalgoKL (talk)

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

- Sitush (talk) 11:52, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

• I refer you again to WP:BRD. Now stop removing that information, please. - Sitush (talk) 11:52, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

• And again. You don't get to force your version into the article against consensus. The prior version had been there for a while. The notice above re: sanctions is going to kick in if you are not careful. - Sitush (talk) 10:15, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

• The same thing applies to you also. You can also not force your version without consensus. -TalgoKL (talk) 04:56, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

• No, you misunderstand. The version before your changes has been there for ages and, which is more, has been accepted by past discussions. That means it is the consensus, pending any revision through further discussion. - Sitush (talk) 07:41, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

You are topic banned for three months from Kachwaha and all related pages, broadly construed. Please read the policy WP:TBAN to see what "topic banned" means.

You have been sanctioned for disruptive editing

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Bishonen | talk 02:42, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Bishonen | talk 02:42, 23 September 2016 (UTC).

February 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —SpacemanSpiff 10:48, 25 February 2017 (UTC)