User talk:Superdan8

Eurofighter Typhoon

Please do not revert this article again. You are already in violation of the Wikipedia:3 revert rule. Thanks. —Wayward ^Talk 14:57, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eurofighter Typhoon

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mark83 00:27, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then stop adding rumoured information onto the page. Deal in facts, or don't do it at all. Superdan

Deal in facts? Then why are you constantly removing FACTS about the status of the RAF's use of the Typhoon's cannon? You have reverted this many many times and four times today — as such I've reported you for violation of the three revert rule. Mark83 19:44, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eurofighter Typhoon

Hi, you violated WP:3RR at Eurofighter Typhoon. I have blocked you for 24 hours. Please feel free to return after your block expires, but talk your differences to the talk page, instead of starting pointless revert wars. Cheers, —Ruud 20:18, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

"Providing an edit summary makes Wikipedia work better by quickly explaining to other users what your change was about.... Proper use of edit summaries is critical to resolving content disputes. Edit summaries should accurately and succinctly summarize the nature of the edit, especially if it could be controversial." Thank you.Mark83 22:00, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

Please sign your posts on talk pages by typing ~~~~ to to be accountable and to help others understand the conversation. Thank you. Mark83 22:04, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]