User talk:Someshkirar

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 07:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 07:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Dhanak, or you will be blocked from editing. sixtynine ^{• spill it •} 07:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Dharam Pal Kirar

An article that you have been involved in editing, Dharam Pal Kirar, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dharam Pal Kirar. Thank you. sixtynine ^{• spill it •} 07:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Do not remove deletion templates to Wikipedia articles until the issue is officially resolved, as it constitutes vandalism. If you continue to make such edits, you will be blocked from editing. sixtynine ^{• spill it •} 23:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of All India Dhanak Organisation

A tag has been placed on All India Dhanak Organisation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. §FreeRangeFrog 06:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Dhanak

A tag has been placed on Dhanak, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. §FreeRangeFrog 06:24, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Dharam pal kirar

A tag has been placed on Dharam pal kirar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. DFS454 (talk) 13:29, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Dharam pal kirar. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. DFS454 (talk) 14:23, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. DFS454 (talk) 14:24, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Proposed deletion of Dhanak

The article Dhanak has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jhbuk (talk) 17:59, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dhanak

The article Dhanak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rodhull andemu 20:11, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dharam pal kirar

The article Dharam pal kirar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 06:00, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just removing the proposed deletion tag does nothing to help us establish notability of the subject. If you can't establish notability, it's just going to get deleted the slow way.--chaser (talk) 06:13, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Dharam pal kirar has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alan (talk) 13:43, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Proposed deletion of Dharam Pal Kirar

The article Dharam Pal Kirar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Entirely unreferenced; no decent evidence on google for its claims

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jhbuk (talk) 23:13, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jhbuk (talk) 23:13, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would advise you that I have deleted the article under Wikipedia:CSD#G4, recreation of an article previously deleted after an WP:AfD discussion. Should you attempt to circumvent this deletion I have WP:SALTed the article. If you find sufficient good third party sources to verify the notability of the subject you may request creation of the article. LessHeard vanU (talk) 23:40, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of YOGESH KIRAR

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on YOGESH KIRAR requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 14:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. --Everyone Dies In the End (talk) 15:16, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Yogesh Kirar

An article that you have been involved in editing, Yogesh Kirar, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yogesh Kirar. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 17:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Yogesh Kirar, you will be blocked from editing. Please see WP:SAA, WP:V and WP:RS for what articles should be like. To stubbonly and persistently keep creating these pages after they have been repeatedly deleted is clearly unhelpful, as it must surely be obvious by now that they are not suitable for inclusion. If you can create an article that has reliable sources to back it up then it will be looked upon more favourably. Jhbuk (talk) 19:25, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for repeatedly removing afd/deletion templates. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 21:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jhbuk (talk) 22:22, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dhanak samaj

A tag has been placed on Dhanak samaj requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 21:41, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Disruptive editing. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

See WP:ANI#User:Someshkirar, per this link. Repeated creation of inappropriate articles, after warnings. You may still be unblocked if you will agree to change your behavior. You do not participate in discussions and you don't respond to complaints. Wikipedia is not for advertising or promotion, it is not for publicizing external websites, and it does not host memorials. EdJohnston (talk) 02:33, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Dhanak.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Dhanak.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:03, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:Dpk new.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Dpk new.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:29, 8 February 2022 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 03:29, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]