User talk:Smith609

	; Archives
	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
	/DOI bot

This user is not currently active on Wikipedia. Smith609 has not edited Wikipedia since 9 January 2024. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

This user rarely has the opportunity to spend time on Wikipedia, so may not respond immediately to comments posted here, and is unlikely to see comments posted elsewhere. If urgent input is required, try e-mailing.

Please note: to avoid duplication, I'll reply to queries on this page.

How to propose images to the author of a wiki for evalutation?

I have some good images ×10 of lichenns that I captured on my olive trees today but I don't know how to propose them.to the author. I found your name at the beginning of lichens article. Ivanmellace (talk) 21:13, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Taxobot

Hi,

Around 10 years ago, you created Taxobot and registered it on Toolforge. It appears to be inactive.

In 2021, Taxobot was created on the French Wikipedia (Github). We would like to attempt deploying that tool on Toolforge under its original name. Since your Taxobot is still registered, albeit inactive, would you be open to rename / delete it on Toolforge to free up the URL for this project?

Thank you. LD (talk) 10:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AA Dragons for you.

🐲🐉 GinnyThomas (talk) 22:45, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For creating User:Citation bot 48JcL48 (talk) (contribs) 00:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Gelman-Rubin statistic

Hello! I reverted you recent edit to Gelman-Rubin statistic. Your edit was badly formatted, and unencyclopedic. If you feel the given formula is incorrect, I encourage you to discuss this issue on the article's talk page. Thanks! DoctorMatt (talk) 06:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the talk page already indicates that the forumla is incorrect. I've restored the edit in a more "encyclopaedic" format – if you feel you can improve the formatting, do please feel free to do so, but I think it's worth keeping the reference in there as in my view, it's better to have badly formatted but correct information than formulae that are perfectly formatted but with no indication that they are misleading! Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 09:45, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]