User talk:Siddhartha.lahiri

Speedy deletion of Siddhartha Lahiri

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. KCinDC (talk) 04:56, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sapient Corporation

Good Siddhartha, I was thinking to move to Sapient (company) to Sapient Corporation, Good you did that :). KuwarOnline ^Talk 06:47, 28 June 2010 (UTC) Being the author of the article: Human Revolution in SGI Buddhism, I disagree with this arbitrary deletion of the word Buddhism from the title. The deletion was based on a personal opinion and is not justified in Wikipedia practice, because if you take a look at the classification of the article you'd see Buddhism.[reply]

Human Revolution Article

The article does not relate to SGI as an organisation, but to the Buddhist teaching of attaining Enlightenment which is termed in SGI Teachings of Buddhism as Human Revolution.

The deletion of the word Buddhism from an article related to the teachings of Buddhism taught by the SGI can be regarded as a matter of misunderstanding by the person who deleted the word "Buddhism" from the title. Deleting "Buddhism" is an act signifying deep misunderstanding. Buddhism is not a private property of any person, branch, temple, school or sect. To deny Zen as a form of Buddhism is simply incorrect and unacceptable and so is the deletion of the Buddhist teaching of SGI from being a "Buddhist perspective". Branches of Buddhism differ mainly in their perspectives on attaining Enlightenment and other doctrines, and the article is an impartial explanation of the teaching of Buddhism taught by SGI on the subject of attaining personal enlightenment. It is a distinct Buddhist perspective, fully documented as well as being practiced by millions of people world wide. It would have been more appropriate in Wiki practice to state one's opinion in Discussion rather than delete the author's given title and contradict the gener and classification of the article. SafwanZabalawi —Preceding unsigned comment added by SafwanZabalawi (talk • contribs) 07:18, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request to Mr Siddharta to respectfully return the word "Buddhism" to the title of the article about Buddhist teaching on Enlightenment taught in SGI doctrines.

Being the author of the article: "Human Revolution in SGI Buddhism", I disagree with this uninformed deletion of the word Buddhism from the title. The deletion was based on a personal opinion and is not justified in Wikipedia practice, because if you take a look at the classification of the article you'd see Buddhism.

Deletion could be justified if the article was about the organisational structure of SGI. The article does not relate to SGI as an organisation, but to the "Buddhist Teaching of Attaining Enlightenment" which is termed in SGI Teachings of Buddhism as Human Revolution.

The deletion of the word Buddhism from an article related to the teachings of Buddhism taught by the SGI is wrong: it is against acknowledged respect to the belief of millions of people world wide. Deleting "Buddhism" is an act signifying deep misunderstanding based on a personal judgement of what Buddhism is and to whom it "should belong". Wiki rules forbid religious bias. Buddhism is not a private property of any person, branch, temple, school or sect. As Christianity has various forms and organisations so is the situation with Buddhism and the Buddhist teaching of SGI constitute "Buddhist perspectives" based on the Lotus Sutra and Nichiren's teachings. Branches of Buddhism differ mainly in their perspectives on attaining Enlightenment and other doctrines, and the article is an impartial explanation of the teaching of Buddhism taught by SGI on the subject of attaining personal enlightenment. It is a distinct Buddhist perspective, fully documented as well as being practiced by millions of people world wide. It would have been more appropriate in Wiki practice to state one's opinion in Discussion rather than delete the author's given title and contradict the gener and classification of the article. I request returning the title to its original form. Consultation with Wiki is also appreciated, as the matter here relates to Wiki rules. SafwanZabalawi —Preceding unsigned comment added by SafwanZabalawi (talk • contribs) 07:38, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Soka Gakkai Logo.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Soka Gakkai Logo.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 07:56, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Soka Gakkai Logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Soka Gakkai Logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:38, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in Human Revolution, makes it harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Gary King (talk · scripts) 07:26, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Sōka Gakkai

Template:Infobox Sōka Gakkai has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:38, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Soka Gakkai Logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:Soka Gakkai Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:00, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]