Hello, Rolandwexler! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.
I'd like to echo that question. Why is a 1994 source "outdated" when discussing a 1940s film? I notice you've deleted the same source from a number of pages. Could you explain your reasoning more fully? Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 21:04, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Peaceray,
I am the author of the book (source) in question. When I wrote the George Sidney book in the early 1990s, I did not have access to the materials that are now housed at the Smithsonian under Mr. Sidney's name. There is information that will be more complete in an upcoming book I am preparing and would rather have mentioned as a source when published. Therefore, I deleted the Further Reading reference. EM 2600:6C5E:457F:9A29:74B8:B6B8:E36D:9F09 (talk) 03:49, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]