User talk:Rana Ammar Mazhar

Welcome!

Hello, Rana Ammar Mazhar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! - TwoOars ^{(T | C)} 18:40, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. An article you recently created, Safe Oral Sex Technique, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. - TwoOars ^{(T | C)} 18:40, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Anal Sex in Hadith.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Anal Sex in Hadith.JPG. The copy called Image:Anal Sex in Hadith.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 19:47, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Safe Oral Sex Technique

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Safe Oral Sex Technique. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.- TwoOars ^{(T | C)} 19:58, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (aeropagitica) 20:28, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Safe Oral Sex Technique

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Safe Oral Sex Technique, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. - Zeibura S. Kathau ^{(Info | Talk)} 02:39, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Anal Sex in Hadith.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Anal Sex in Hadith.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:56, 8 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Adambro 12:56, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

advice

I am having a hard time defending some of your articles related to human sexuality. They probably are notable, but a transcript from the hadith is not quite enough. What would really help is a reference and excerpt from one or two printed textbooks of Islamic law on these matters, preferably in English but if not with the excerpt translated. I'm not sure it will do the trick, but it will help. And do not remove tags. Ever. If you put a "hangon" tag it should be sufficient. DGG 20:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Anal Sex in Hadith, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Anal Sex in Hadith is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Anal Sex in Hadith saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. Metros232 12:52, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Interpretation of Holy Quran Verse by Sahih Bukhari Hadith.JPG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Interpretation of Holy Quran Verse by Sahih Bukhari Hadith.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:35, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Interpretation of Holy Quran Verse by Sahih Bukhari Hadith.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Interpretation of Holy Quran Verse by Sahih Bukhari Hadith.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 10:46, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Allama Habibur Rahman Kandhalvi

A tag has been placed on Allama Habibur Rahman Kandhalvi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 05:50, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

arabic wikipedia

Elsalam alicom, ur articles in sex and in islam are so usful, i invite u to write such as this articles in arabic wikipedia because it suffers from week in such as this articlrs --Mmustafa 10:22, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Translate in Arabic

AA. Please feel free to translate in Arabic. Thanks.

Speedy deletion of Personalities Renowned By Mother Names

A tag has been placed on Personalities Renowned By Mother Names, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Domthedude001 02:19, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Personalities Renowned By Mother Names

An article that you have been involved in editing, Personalities Renowned By Mother Names, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Personalities Renowned By Mother Names. Thank you. Carlossuarez46 05:03, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Islamic view of anal sex

Rana, please stop reverting to the pre-cleanup. See the talk page please and discuss major changes. Akerbeltz (talk) 11:46, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Anal sex in Sunni Islam is prohibited, and is controversial among Islamic scholars. Disputes over anal sex also appear in pre-modern sources such as the hadith of Sahih Bukhari and Usul al-Kafi. It is practiced by some Muslims as a means of family planning on the authority of above cites sources. It is currently overwhelmingly considered taboo however.

The Quran says "Your wives are a tilth for you [[[you refer to men not women]]], so have your tilth, whenever, however and wherever you wish 'any time, anyway or any style and any place this is the meaning of Anna in Arabic', and do introduction of yourself [[[means foreplay]]]]. and also do it with them your wives from where god ordered And fear god [[god in Arabic means Allah], and know that you are to meet Him (in the Hereafter), and give good tidings to the believers." ^{[Quran 2:223]}

The latest understanding of this verses, is that wives (women) are tilth for men, so the tilth happens to men in this sentence, and tilth here not means reproduction as men don't get pregnant, so tilth here means refreshing the body and giving energy to men as happens to the land after tilthing. so verses says have your tilth you men and the way you like not certain way, as it depends on free imagination without rules, so that means anal sex is allowed as the verses here gave permission to totally free style sex with wives as word [anna] means in Arabic whenever, wherever and however in the same time. after that verses asked to have vaginal sex also besides any type of sex you like [and also from where Allah ordered] as verses says [ and also ] and didn’t say [ only from where Allah ordered ] this verses came after a famous companion of the messenger called Omar Ibn Elkhattab made anal sex with his wife, and came to the messenger and said I'm lost god messenger, I switched my traveler [pines destination] yesterday, then this verses descended. so this verses talking mainly about anal sex.

Actually old interpreters feel shy about this verses and tried to interpret it by other ways to avoid saying allah permit totally free sex style including anal sex as long as it's with the wives like: {tilth means reproduction so the verses talk about free style sex (any pose any scinario any time) but vaginal sex only} and they say this companion means doggy style as he did it vaginally but from behind. But the verses clearly says women do tilth to men not the contrary, so tilth happens to men not women so verses is not talking about reproduction or vaginal sex, it talk about sex in general and anal sex was the reason story for descending this verses. also it's not logic that men have desire for having children so they have their tilth (as reproduction as old interpreters say) in the position they like including doggy style as they say doggy style is what this companion made and thought it's a disaster. no men think of children while enjoying having poses?? That is completely not logic.

References for and against

The Bukhari Sharif Hadith 4170 & 4171 state that anal sex is permissible (halal). It also refers to what al-Bukhaari tells of Naafi' telling of Ibn Umar analysing the passage "so go to your tilth when or how you will". Umar's interpretation was that "he may approach her from …" (Volume 6, Book 60, Number 50 = #4253). Umar's interpretation however has been questioned.

On the ellipsis Ibn Hajar says in Fath al-Bari (8/189): This is how it appears in all the texts. It does not mention what comes after the word "from".' He also quotes other sources than al-Bukhaari, which have Ibn 'Umar saying "He may approach her in her back passage."

Most Muslim jurists agree that anal sex is haram, based on the hadith: "Do not have anal sex with women", reported by Ahmad, At-Tirmidhi, Al-Nasa'i and Ibn Majah.

Khuzaima ibn Thabit also reports that the messenger of Allah said: "Allah is not too shy to tell you the truth: "Do not have sex with your wives in the anus", reported by Ahmad, 5/213.

`Abd Allah ibn `Abbas narrates: "The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said: "Allah will not look at a man who has anal sex with his wife", reported by Ibn Abi Shaybah (3/529) and At-Tirmidhi, classified it as an authentic hadith (1165).

It is reported that Muhammad referred to such acts as "minor sodomy," reported by Ahmad and An-Nasa'i.

However, there are hadith which permit anal sex, one in Sunni Islam and two in Shia Islam. The Sahih Bukhari (Volume 6, Book 60: Prophetic Commentary on the Qur'an (Tafseer of the Prophet), Hadith No. 50), an important document for Sunnis, permits it. Its authenticity is conformed by a hadith of Sunan Abu Dawud (Book 11: Marriage (Kitab Al-Nikah), Hadith Number 2159), though the said hadith itself is in disagreement with many other hadith in other books, except for the Sahih Bukhari..

In Shia Islam, the book of hadith Kitab al-Kafi (the Bukhari of Shi'ism) states that that anal sex with woman is considered repulsive. The Grand Ayatollah has decreed that anal intercourse is "not permissible without the wife's consent".

Existence of Narratives on Allowance of Anal Sex in Arabic as Proof

أرجو مساعدتي في معرفة الصواب ، في البخاري الحديث رقم (4170) و (4171) إن الإتيان في الدبر حلال ، وموقعكم يقول إنه حرام ، فما هو الصواب ؟

ولعل السائل يعني أيضا ما رواه البخاري عن نافع عن ابن عمر رضي الله عنهما : ( فَأْتُوا حَرْثَكُمْ أَنَّى شِئْتُمْ ) قال : يأتيها في . . . قال ابن حجر في "فتح الباري" (8/189) : " هكذا وقع في جميع النسخ ، لم يذكر ما بعد الظرف وهو المجرور " انتهى . ثم ذكر ما جاء من بعض الروايات خارج صحيح البخاري أن ابن عمر قال : يأتيها في دبرها.

[4], [5]

قال القرطبي: وممن نُسب إليه هذا القول سعيد بن المسيب ونافع وابن عمر ومحمد بن كعب القرظي وعبد الملك بن الماجشون، وحُكي ذلك عن مالك في كتاب له يُسمَّى كتاب السر، وحُذّاق أصحاب مالك ومشايخهم ينكرون ذلك الكتاب...

وذكر ابن العربي أن ابن شعبان أسند جواز هذا القول إلى زمرة كبيرة من الصحابة والتابعين وإلى مالك من روايات كثيرة في كتاب (جماع النسوان وأحكام القِرَان)، وقال الكيا الطبري: وروي عن محمد بن كعب القرظي أنه كان لا يرى بذلك بأساً (1).

وقال ابن قدامة في المغني: ورُويت إباحته عن ابن عمر وزيد بن أسلم ونافع ومالك، وروي عن مالك أنه قال: ما أدركتُ أحداً أقتدي به في ديني يشك في أنه حلال (2).

ولا بأس بنقل ما ذكره السيوطي في الدر المنثور مع طوله، فإن فيه فوائد كثيرة.

قال السيوطي: أخرج إسحاق بن راهويه في مسنده وتفسيره والبخاري وابن جرير عن نافع قال: قرأت ذات يوم ( نِسَاؤُكُمْ حَرْثٌ لَّكُمْ فَأْتُواْ حَرْثَكُمْ أنَّى شِئْتُمْ ) قال ابن عمر: أتدري فيم أنزلت هذه الآية؟ قلت: لا. قال: نزلت في إتيان النساء في أدبارهن.

[6]

((- المجموع - محيى الدين النووي ج 61 ص 420 : وقد نقل ابن قدامة رواية عن مالك . قوله ما أدركت أحدا أقتدى به في دينى يشك في أنه حلال ، ثم أنكر ذلك أصحابه العراقيون ))). ونقل ايضا: - المجموع - محيى الدين النووي ج 61 ص 420 : قال المزني ، قال الشافعي ذهب بعض أصحابنا إلى احلاله وآخرون إلى تحريمه ولا أرخص فيه بل أنهى عنه . وحكى أن مالكا سئل عن ذلك فقال ( الآن اغتسلت منه )

وهذه ايضا اقوال وروايات نقلها صاحب الدر المنثور .. - الدر المنثور - جلال الدين السيوطي ج 1 ص 265 : في الآية ) * * أخرج اسحق بن راهوية في مسنده وتفسيره والبخاري وابن جرير عن نافع قال قرأت ذات يوم نساؤكم حرث لكم فاتوا حرثكم أنى شئتم قال ابن عمر أتدرى فيم أنزلت هذه الآية قلت لا قال نزلت في اتيان النساء في أدبارهن *

وأخرج البخاري وابن جرير عن ابن عمر فاتوا حرثكم أنى شئتم قال في الدبر *

وأخرج الخطيب في رواة مالك من طريق النضر بن عبد الله الازدي عن مالك عن نافع عن ابن عمر في قوله نساؤكم حرث لكم فاتوا حرثكم أنى شئتم قال ان شاء في قبلها وان شاء في دبرها *

وأخرج الحسن بن سفيان في مسنده والطبراني في الاوسط والحاكم وأبو نعيم في المستخرج بسند حسن عن ابن عمر قال انما نزلت على رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم نساؤكم حرث لكم الآية رخصة في اتيان الدبر

• وأخرج ابن جرير والطبراني في الاوسط وابن مردويه وابن النجار بسند حسن عن ابن عمر ان رجلا أصاب امرأته في دبرها في زمن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم فانكر ذلك الناس وقالوا أتقرؤها فانزل الله نساؤكم حرث لكم الآية *

وأخرج الخطيب في رواة مالك من طريق أحمد بن الحكم العبدى عن مالك عن نافع عن ابن عمر قال جاءت امرأة من الانصار إلى النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم تشكو زوجها فانزل الله نساؤكم حرث لكم الآية * وأخرج النسائي وابن جرير من طريق زيد بن أسلم عن ابن / صفحة 266 / عمر ان رجلا أتى امرأته في دبرها فوجد في نفسه من ذلك وجدا شديدا فانزل الله نساؤكم حرث لكم فاتوا حرثكم انى شئتم

• وأخرج الدارقطني في غرائب مالك من طريق أبى بشر الدولابى نبانا أبو الحرث أحمد بن سعيد نبانا أبو ثابت محمد بن عبيد الله المدنى حدثنى عبد العزيز بن محمد الدراوردى عن عبد الله بن عمر بن حفص وابن أبى ذئب ومالك بن أنس فرقهم كلهم عن نافع قال قال لى ابن عمر امسك على المصحف يا نافع فقرأ حتى أتى على نساؤكم حرث لكم فاتوا حرثكم أنى شئتم قال لى تدرى يا نافع فيم نزلت هذه الآية قلت لا قال نزلت في رجل من الانصار أصاب امرأته في دبرها فاعظم الناس ذلك فانزل الله نساؤكم حرث لكم فاتوا حرثكم أنى شئتم الآية قلت له من دبرها في قبلها قال لا الا في دبرها

وقال الرفافى فوائده تخريج الدارقطني نبانا أبو أحمد بن عبدوس نبانا على بن الجعد نبانا ابن أبى ذئب عن نافع عن ابن عمر قال وقع رجل على امرأته في دبرها فانزل الله نساؤكم حرث لكم فاتوا حرثكم أنى شئتم قال فقلت لابن أبى ذئب ما تقول أنت في هذا قال ما أقول فيه بعد هذا

• وأخرج الطبراني وابن مردويه وأحمد بن أسامة التجيبى في فوائده عن نافع قال قرأ ابن عمر هذه السورة فمر بهذه الآية نساؤكم حرث لكم الآية فقال تدرى فيم أنزلت هذه الآية قال لا قال في رجال كانوا ياتون النساء في أدبارهن

• وأخرج الدارقطني ودعلج كلاهما في غرائب مالك من طريق أبى مصعب واسحق بن محمد القروى كلاهما عن نافع عن ابن عمر انه قال يا نافع امسك على المصحف فقرأ حتى بلغ نساؤكم حرث لكم الآية فقال يا نافع أتدرى فيم أنزلت هذه الآية قلت لا قال نزلت في رجل من الانصار أصاب امرأته في دبرها فوجد في نفسه من ذلك فسأل النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم فانزل الله الآية قال الدارقطني هذا ثابت عن مالك وقال ابن عبد البر الرواية عن ابن عمر بهذا المعنى صحيحة معروفة عنه مشهورة

• وأخرج ابن راهويه وأبو يعلى وابن جرير والطحاوى في مشكل الآثار وابن مردويه بسند حسن عن أبى سعيد الخدرى أن رجلا أصاب امرأته في دبرها فانكر الناس عليه ذلك فانزلت نساؤكم حرث لكم فاتوا حرثكم أنى شئتم

• وأخرج النسائي والطحاوى وابن جرير والدارقطني من طريق عبد الرحمن بن القاسم عن مالك بن أنس أنه قيل له يا ابا عبد الله ان الناس يروون عن سالم بن عبد الله أنه قال كذب العبد أو العلج على أبى فقال مالك أشهد على يزيد بن رومان أنه أخبرني عن سالم بن عبد الله عن ابن عمر مثل ما قال نافع فقيل له فان الحارث بن يعقوب يروى عن أبى الحباب سعيد بن يسار أنه سأل ابن عمر فقال يا أبا عبد الرحمن انا نشترى الجوارى أفنحمض لهن قال وما التحميض فذكر له الدبر فقال ابن عمر أف أف أيفعل ذلك مؤمن أو قال مسلم فقال مالك أشهد على ربيعة أخبرني عن أبى الحباب عن ابن عمر مثل ما قال نافع قال الدارقطني هذا محفوظ عن مالك صحيح

• وأخرج النسائي من طريق يزيد بن رومان عن عبيد الله بن عبد الله بن عمر أن عبد الله بن عمر كان لا يرى بأسا أن ياتي الرجل المرأة في دبرها

• وأخرج البيهقى في سننه عن محمد بن على قال كنت عند محمد بن كعب القرظى فجاءه رجل فقال ما تقول في اتيان المرأة في دبرها فقال هذا شيخ من قريش فسله يعنى عبد الله بن على بن السائب فقال قذر ولو كان حلالا

• وأخرج ابن جرير عن الدراوردى قال قيل لزيد بن أسلم ان محمد بن المنكدر نهى عن اتيان النساء في أدبارهن فقال زيد أشهد على محمد لاخبرني أنه يفعله

• وأخرج ابن جرير عن ابن أبى مليكة أنه سئل عن اتيان المرأة في دبرها فقال قد أردته من جارية لى البارحة فاعتاصت على فاستعنت بدهن *

وأخرج الخطيب في رواة مالك عن أبى سليمان الجوزجانى قال سألت مالك بن أنس عن وطئ الحلائل في الدبر فقال لى الساعة غسلت رأسي منه

• وأخرج ابن جرير في كتاب النكاح من طريق ابن وهب عن مالك أنه مباح * وأخرج الطحاوي من طريق أصبغ بن الفرج عن عبد الله بن القاسم قال ما أدركت أحدا أقتدى به في دينى يشك في أنه حلال يعنى وطئ المرأة في دبرها ثم قرأ نساؤكم حرث لكم ثم قال فاى شئ أبين من هذا

• وأخرج الطحاوي والحاكم في مناقب الشافعي والخطيب عن محمد بن عبد الله بن عبد الحكم أن الشافعي سئل عنه فقال ما صح عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم في تحليله ولا تحريمه شئ والقياس انه حلال *

وأخرج الحاكم عن ابن عبد الحكم ان الشافعي ناظر محمد بن الحسن في ذلك فاحتج عليه ابن الحسن بان الحرث انما يكون في الفرج فقال له فيكون ما سوى الفرج محرما فالتزمه فقال أرأيت لو وطئها بين ساقيها أو في اعكانها أفى ذلك حرث قال لا قال أفيحرم قال لا قال فكيف تحتج بمالا تقول به قال الحاكم لعل الشافعي كان يقول ذلك في القديم وأما في الجديد فصرح بالتحريم *

فهل بعد قول مالك ((ما أدركت أحدا أقتدى به في دينى يشك في أنه حلال)) هل بعد هذا يقال انه لم يقل به احد الا الشيعة الامامية الاثني عشرية ..

[7]

Narratives on the Prohibition of Anal Sex

All Muslim jurists agree that anal sex is Haram, based on the Hadith: "Do not have anal sex with women." (Reported by Ahmad, At-Tirmidhi, An-Nasaa'i, and Ibn Majah.)

Khuzaymah Ibn Thaabit also reports that the Messenger of Allah, said: "Allah is not too shy to tell you the truth: Do not have sex with your wives in the anus." (Reported by Ahmad, 5/213.)

Ibn `Abbaas narrates: "The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said: "Allah will not look at a man who has anal sex with his wife." (Reported by Ibn Abi Shaybah, 3/529, and At-Tirmidhi classified it as an authentic Hadith, 1165.)

Further, it is reported that Muhammad referred to such an act as "minor sodomy." (Reported by Ahmad and An-Nasaa'i.)

Anal sex and Sunni Islam

However, there are Ahadith which allows (anus, in Arabic Dubur: “ فِي الدُّبُر ” ) sex, one in Sunni sect and two in Shia sect. In Sunni sect, a high rated Hadith Book Sahih Bukhari, Volume 6, Book 60: Prophetic Commentary on the Qur'an (Tafseer of the Prophet), Hadith No. 50, allows it, its authenticity and anal sex concept is conformed by a Hadith of Sunan Abu-Dawud, Book 11: Marriage (Kitab Al-Nikah), Hadith Number 2159 , whereas the said Hadith itself disapproves along with many other Ahadith in other books except Sahih Bukhari..

Ijma & Bukhari Hadith

Narrated Nafi': Whenever Ibn 'Umar recited the Qur'an, he would not speak to anyone till he had finished his recitation. Once I held the Qur'an and he recited Surat-al-Baqara from his memory and then stopped at a certain Verse and said, "Do you know in what connection this Verse was revealed? " I replied, "No." He said, "It was revealed in such-and-such connection." Ibn 'Umar then resumed his recitation. Nafi added regarding the Verse:--"So go to your tilth when or how you will" Ibn 'Umar said, "It means one should approach his wife in ...(anus)" (Volume 6, Book 60, Number 50 = #4253).

Anal Sex and Shia Islam

In Shia Islam, a high rated Hadith Book “Usool al- Kafi, i.e., The Bukhari of Shi'ism” says that anal sex with woman is Mekruh.

The Grand Ayatollah has issued that anal intercourse is not permissible without wife's consent. If she is consenting, it would be strongly Makrooh (abominable).

Imam Malik View

In other reference, Imam Malik said that anal intercourse is haram (prohibited), but enjoyment of the rear (anus: dubur) without penetration (eelaaj) is licit. It is lawful to place a finger on the anus as foreplay as long as it does not penetrate.

Ibn Kathir View

The anal sex concept of Sahih Bukhari was denied later on by other scholars such as by "Ibn Kathir" in "Tafsir Ibn Kathir" - Quran Tafsir – “The Reason behind revealing Allah's Statement Your Wives are a Tilth for You”.

Some forbid buttsecking as an obligatory precaution.

Anal sex and Tafseer Tabari

Imam Tabari cites as:

حَدَّثَنِي أَبُو قِلَابَةَ قَالَ : ثنا عَبْد الصَّمَد , قَالَ : ثني أَبِي , عَنْ أَيُّوب , عَنْ نَافِع , عَنْ ابْن عُمَر : { فَأْتُوا حَرْثكُمْ أَنَّى شِئْتُمْ } قَالَ : فِي الدُّبُر

Hadith No. 3468 .

Translation of Arabic Text: It was narrated by Abu Kilaba, narrated by Abdel Samad, who said that it was narrated by his father who narrated from Ayub, narrated from Nafi’, narrated by Ibn Umar who said that (Sura 2:223), ‘Your wives are as a tilth unto you: so approach your tilth when or how you will’ means (فِي الدُّبُر ) in anus.[8]

Anal Sex and Sahih Bukhari

In Sahih Bukhari Hadith & Urdu translation of the Hadith by renowned Ahle Hadith scholar Waheed-uz-Zaman, it is clearly written in bracket, that is, “in Anus” , in Arabic, “ فِي الدُّبُر ”.

Interpretation of Quran Verse by Sahih Bukhari Hadith & Urdu translation of the Hadith by renowned Ahle Hadith scholar Waheed-uz-Zaman, it is clearly written in bracket, that is, “in Anus” , in Arabic, “ فِي الدُّبُر ”.

Narrated Abdullah Ibn Abbas:

Ibn Umar misunderstood (the Qur'anic verse, "So come to your tilth however you will") --may Allah forgive him. The fact is that this clan of the Ansar, who were idolaters, lived in the company of the Jews who were the people of the Book. They (the Ansar) accepted their superiority over themselves in respect of knowledge, and they followed most of their actions. The people of the Book (i.e. the Jews) used to have intercourse with their women on one side alone (i.e. lying on their backs). This was the most concealing position for (the vagina of) the women. This clan of the Ansar adopted this practice from them. But this tribe of the Quraysh used to uncover their women completely, and seek pleasure with them from in front and behind and laying them on their backs.

When the muhajirun (the immigrants) came to Medina, a man married a woman of the Ansar. He began to do the same kind of action with her, but she disliked it, and said to him: We were approached on one side (i.e. lying on the back); do it so, otherwise keep away from me. This matter of theirs spread widely, and it reached the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him).

So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur'anic verse: "Your wives are a tilth to you, so come to your tilth however you will," i.e. from in front, from behind or lying on the back. But this verse meant the place of the delivery of the child, i.e. the vagina.

Anal Sex and Tafseer of Sahih Bukhari Hadith

In Bukhari Hadith Tafseer, it is clearly written “in Anus” , in Arabic, “ فِي الدُّبُر ”.

Image: Urdu translation of Anal Sex and Tafseer of Sahih Bukhari Hadith. It is clearly written “in Anus” , in Arabic, “ فِي الدُّبُر ”.

Anal sex and Hanafi sect

http://www.scribd.com/doc/11183198/Sahih-Bukhari-Narration-on-Anal-Sex

For the Hanafi view, read the Arabic Text, the English translation & the image in Arabic and Urdu below:

The Arabic Text:

وفي المغني ج7ص225 : ( ورويت إباحته عن ابن عمر وزيد بن أسلم ونافع ومالك ، وروي عن مالك أنه قال : ما أدركت أحد أقتدي به في ديني يشك في أنه حلال . وأهل العراق من أصحاب مالك ينكرون ذلك واحتج من أجله بقول الله عز وجل {نِسَاؤُكُمْ حَرْثٌ لَكُمْ فَأْتُوا حَرْثَكُمْ أَنَّى شِئْتُمْ}(البقرة/223) وقوله سبحانه {وَالَّذِينَ هُمْ لِفُرُوجِهِمْ حَافِظُونَ إِلاَّ عَلَى أَزْوَاجِهِمْ أوْ مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُهُمْ فَإِنَّهُمْ غَيْرُ مَلُومِينَ}(المؤمنون/5-6) ) .

This is in the great Sunni book al-Mughni Bi Ibn Kudadma: The permissibility was narrated on Ibn Omar , Zaid Ibn Aslam and Nafi'i And Malik : and it's been narrated on Malik that he said: I never spoke to someone I deem a role model in religion who doubts that it's Halal. [9].

File:Anal Sex and Hanafi Sect.JPG

Anal Sex and Hanafi Sect, in Arabic & Urdu translation. It is clearly written “in Anus” , in Arabic, “ فِي الدُّبُر ”.

Image: Anal Sex and Hanafi Sect, in Arabic & Urdu translation. It is clearly written “in Anus” , in Arabic, “ فِي الدُّبُر ”.

Contradiction in Hadith Literature

This article appears to contradict itself, because of contradiction in Hadith literature itself.

Sahih Bukhari book 60 Hadith No. 50 has mentioned directly of Anal Sex and is not referring to the same matter as Hadith No. 51. The reasoning that the Arabic text of Hadith has left the word blank is valid. Other references are as:

An-Nasa'i reported that Ka`b bin `Alqamah said that Abu An-Nadr said that he asked Nafi`, "The people are repeating the statement that you relate from Ibn `Umar that he allowed sex with women in their rear (anus). He said, "They have said a lie about me. But let me tell you what really happened. Ibn `Umar was once reciting the Qur'an while I was with him and he reached the Ayah:

(Your wives are a tilth for you, so go to your tilth, when or how you will,) He then said, `O Nafi`! Do you know the story behind this Ayah' I said, `No.' He said, `We, the people of Quraysh, used to have sexual intercourse with our wives from the back (in the vagina). When we migrated to Al-Madinah and married some Ansari women, we wanted to do the same with them. They disliked it and made a big issue out of it. The Ansari women had followed the practice of the Jews who have sex with their women while they lay on their sides. Then, Allah revealed: (Your wives are a tilth for you, so go to your tilth, when or how you will,) This has an authentic chain of narrators.

Abu Muhammad `Abdullah bin `Abdur-Rahman Darimi reported in his Musnad that Sa`id bin Yasar Abu Hubab said: I said to Ibn `Umar, "What do you say about having sex with women in the rear He said, "What does it mean I said, "Anal sex. He said, "Does a Muslim do that This Hadith has an authentic chain of narrators and is an explicit rejection of anal sex from Ibn `Umar.

Abu Bakr bin Ziyad Naysaburi reported that Isma`il bin Ruh said that he asked Malik bin Anas, "What do you say about having sex with women in the anus He said, "You are not an Arab Does sex occur but in the place of pregnancy Do it only in the Farj (vagina). I said, "O Abu `Abdullah! They say that you allow that practice. He said, "They utter a lie about me, they lie about me. This is Malik's firm stance on this subject. It is also the view of Sa`id bin Musayyib, Abu Salamah, `Ikrimah, Tawus, `Ata , Sa`id bin Jubayr, `Urwah bin Az-Zubayr, Mujahid bin Jabr, Al-Hasan and other scholars of the Salaf (the Companions and the following two generations after them). They all, along with the majority of the scholars, harshly rebuked the practice of anal sex and many of them called this practice a Kufr.

See also

• Shabbir Ahmed (writer)
• Oral sex in Islamic law

External links

• Islamic Ruling on Anal Sex IslamOnline.net
• The Islamic Sexual Morality (2) Its Structure
• Narratives on the Prohibition of Anal Sex

Possibly unfree File:Shah Waliullah & Salat.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shah Waliullah & Salat.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

File source problem with File:Shah Waliullah & Salat.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Shah Waliullah & Salat.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:44, 18 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Colds7ream (talk) 14:44, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

source

File source is at:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/9726229/Three-Salah-Salat-Timings-of-Quran-by-Shah-Waliullah-Shah-Wali-Ullah

Speedy deletion nomination of Anal Sex in Hadith

A tag has been placed on Anal Sex in Hadith requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Vinithehat (talk) 05:42, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: Allama Habibur Rahman Kandhalvi

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Allama Habibur Rahman Kandhalvi meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allama Habibur Rahman Kandhalvi. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last seven days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Cunard (talk) 07:44, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Allama Habibur Rahman Kandhalvi

The article Allama Habibur Rahman Kandhalvi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article does not demonstrate any notability, no indication he would meet WP:AUTHOR.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Glenfarclas (talk) 03:33, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Allama Tamanna Imadi

The article Allama Tamanna Imadi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BASIC in Wikipedia:Notability (people).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AmritasyaPutra^T 09:34, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Allama Tamanna Imadi

The article Allama Tamanna Imadi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable individual, with page full of linkspam

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Worm^TT(talk) 20:13, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Islamic views on oral sex for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Islamic views on oral sex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic views on oral sex until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Iskandar323 (talk) 08:56, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Islamic views on anal sex for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Islamic views on anal sex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic views on anal sex until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Iskandar323 (talk) 09:03, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Oral Sex in Sahih Al-Bukhari.JPG

The file File:Oral Sex in Sahih Al-Bukhari.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

#12 File is unused, obsolete. Source is questionable. The file uploader didn't seem sure of the source giving 2 different sources- once at time of upload and a different source with a subsequent edit.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 12:54, 25 March 2023 (UTC)