User talk:Qa003qa003

Orphaned non-free image File:Snapshot20110820110024.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Snapshot20110820110024.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:20, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:One Tree Hill Logo.png

Hello, Qa003qa003!

It was really helpful of you to you to upload File:One Tree Hill Logo.png. However, we need to properly format the image license information in order to keep and use new images.

If you can edit the description and add one of these templates, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Hawaii Five-0 S2 Poster.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Hawaii Five-0 S2 Poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:15, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Qa003qa003. You have new messages at Hazard-SJ's talk page.
Message added 22:05, 27 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hazard-SJ ✈ 22:05, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Smallville ratings

I have reverted your edit again for multiple reasons. The first being that the ratings are already listed on the episode table. You're basically creating a second episode table minus plot summary. Secondly, the "share" rating is a figure that is not readily understandable to the average reader and has to be explained in a level of detail that a table cannot provide. That is why you don't see it on many pages, and you don't see it on any other Smallville page. That said, if you feel that passionately about it then I would ask that you follow WP:BRD, which states that after being reverted you take the edit to the talk page to discuss it instead of engaging in an edit war about it. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 18:06, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your question (probably because you didn't actually ask one - and that may be because your english is not strong), but I am going to assume that your question was intended to be, "Then please explain why The Big Bang Theory season five page has so many tables?" If that's the case, then I don't have an explaination other than it shouldn't and someone was rather over zealous when they were adding information. There is nothing wrong with ratings for a show from other countries, but that is not what you were adding. You were adding 18-49 shares, which as a basic figure is utterly meaningless because most readers don't understand "shares". Ignoring the fact that just because other pages do something does not mean that they should be doing it, I would say that Smallville (season 1), which is a featured article, does not have it and no one has every questioned why it did not have it when it went through numerous reviews. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 02:37, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are different types of "ratings". There is are "share" ratings, there are "total viewership" ratings, and then there are demographic ratings that are base on age of consumers. You're adding "share" ratings, which is percentage figure based on number of households watching tv and does not say as much as total viewership ratings. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 04:41, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are US ratings at Smallville (season 10)#Episodes. The right most column has the Neilsen ratings for total viewers. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 12:53, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what you're saying. TBBT S5 says "Viewers (millions", that IS total viewers. It just does not say "Total" in front of it. The figure says that there were 14 million viewers, that was "total". BIGNOLE (Contact me) 16:04, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I still do not know what you're talking about. I'm sorry. The only difference I see is that one has just total viewers and the others hs total viewers and the "share" rating. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 00:21, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The same issue here is true for Arrow. We have ratings in the episode table already, and readers don't understand the concept of "shares". BIGNOLE (Contact me) 14:02, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the Nielsen ratings exist in the EPISODE table already. We do not need the "share" ratings. Readers do NOT understand the share ratings. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 14:10, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that we have a page that explains the figure. What I'm saying is that most readers do not understand it, and we shouldn't have to send them to another page just to explain what the share actually means. If it's not readily apparent while reading then it's probably not important enough to include. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 14:35, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm quite aware of that as well, but again the reader does not understand shares. It's a complicated system and not as simple as "total viewers". Rarely, if every, are you going to have low shares and high total viewers. They go hand in hand. If a show is cancelled because it consistently has low share rates, then we discuss that in words. We don't need a table chronicling shares when readers don't understand the information. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 14:47, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen your video multiple times and it's till a complicated procedure. YOu have been reverted 2 times now. If you feel that strongly about it, then go to the talk page and propose a change. Right now, you're duplicatin information that is already on the page (we don't need 2 tables that have viewer numbers). Here is a link to the discussion that I have already started: (Talk:Arrow (TV series)#Nielsen ratings). BIGNOLE (Contact me) 16:16, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hoodwinked! edit

Hi. I noticed that you removed the category Weinstein Company animated films from Hoodwinked! Since this film was animated and was released by the Weinstein Company, I see no reason for why the category would not be applicable and have re-added it to the article. If you really feel that the article should not be placed in that category, please explain your reasoning. Thanks. --Jpcase (talk) 15:12, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How I Met Your Mother

There is a discussion underway about "Websites", a section that you restored to How I Met Your Mother. The discussion may be found here. Your participation in this discussion is encouraged. Thank you. --AussieLegend (✉) 17:37, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2008 Chatsworth train collision

Hi Qa003qa003! Thank's for creating {{2008 Chatsworth train collision map}}. I think it makes a great addition to the infobox on 2008 Chatsworth train collision. However, the template isn't displaying correctly and there is extra code above and below the template in the infobox. I'd fix it myself, but I am unfamiliar with route diagram templates. Do you think you can take a look at it? – Zntrip 04:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Grimm season 2 poster.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Grimm season 2 poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 16:43, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

你好

我不能读或写汉字. 首先, 上海地铁不应该包括上海磁浮线因为上海磁浮是不是一条地铁线. 所以它不计算. 首尔地铁长度是正确. 但是,在二月2014年, AREX将有高铁服务. AREX不会是一条地铁线了和首尔的长度将被扣除. 你有什么参考依据说明上海作为世界上最长的地铁? 不计算磁浮线. (talk)15:37, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

它不原创研究, 我已经表明中国和西方新闻只有运用上海地铁1号线至13号线和16号线. 磁浮线不是地铁这是事实. 请参阅地鐵, 磁浮线不相配地鐵. 首尔能将多个公司运行的线路合并计算因为所有线路是真正地铁.Terramorphous (talk) 23:01, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock}}

We need your IP address to process this request. If you're uncomfortable posting your IP address, then you can use WP:UTRS. PhilKnight (talk) 20:13, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Qa003qa003 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Requesting an IP address block exemption, because i from china so some time i use proxy login edit. and some time i use 117.162.181.108 can't edit Qa003qa003 (talk) 06:44, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

IP block exemption granted. PhilKnight (talk) 21:36, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IP block exempt

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this userright to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked (through the use of CheckUser) periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. PhilKnight (talk) 21:37, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Qa003qa003. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Qa003qa003. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Qa003qa003. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fake Empire Cult logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fake Empire Cult logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]