User talk:Prufrock79
Hey again, thanks for the note, and good job finding the references on Slant Magazine! I'm impressed by your hard work to improve the article. But keep working on it, it still needs more. Another thing is that I'd look for references that actually feature the magazine (i.e. the whole article or piece is about the magazine, or it discusses it in detail) rather than just mentioning it. Remember, you must be able to back up each claim in the article with reliable sources, those sentences that aren't backed up can be removed at any time. Anyway, great work so far. Keep in touch! Definitely let me know if you need help with anything. Peace, delldot talk 06:00, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Reviews
[edit]Please don't put reviews in the |Reviews = field. We don't use that anymore. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:40, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
- QUIT USING THE REVIEWS FIELD. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 21:33, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- Also, please don't edit archived talk pages, as you did here: [1] Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 22:27, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
- Please. Don't. Put. Reviews. In. The. Infobox. Is there some word in that sentence you're not understanding? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 01:40, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
- When a page is formatted with the new professional ratings table, I use that. If I have added reviews to an infobox since first seeing these reprimands from you, it's because the infobox is already there and the professional ratings table is not. Are those pages never supposed to be updated with new content, or are you saying that I'm expected to reformat the whole page before adding something? Also, I didn't realize I edited an "archived" talk page. A lot of the protocol on this site isn't exactly obvious.Prufrock79 (talk) 20:40, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
- Please. Don't. Put. Reviews. In. The. Infobox. Is there some word in that sentence you're not understanding? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 01:40, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
- Also, please don't edit archived talk pages, as you did here: [1] Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 22:27, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Revscore limit
[edit]I reverted your edit to Wrecking Ball (Bruce Springsteen album). Per WP:ALBUMSEL#Critical reception, no more than 10 reviews should be included in the template. Dan56 (talk) 19:24, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Prufrock79. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Prufrock79. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Prufrock79. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]If you work for Slant Magazine, you need to disclose this on your user page
[edit]Per WP:COI and WP:PAID. It seems your contributions, at least for the last two years, have only been to add poorly formatted Slant Magazine references to album articles. If you work for the site, you need to disclose your connection. If you are just a fan of the website, then either way, please fill out the references you add better by adding the publication date, accessdate, author of the article and actually adding the title from the website and not just the lazy "Slant review". Thank you. Ss112 09:50, 17 January 2020 (UTC)