User talk:Pjkmorris

This is Pjkmorris's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Angelique Kasmara (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not appear to meet WP:NAUTHOR.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Angelique Kasmara and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Angelique Kasmara, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 09:22, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pjkmorris! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 09:22, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Angelique Kasmara (January 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RPSkokie was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Angelique Kasmara and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Angelique Kasmara, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RPSkokie (talk) 12:26, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Angelique Kasmara

Hello, Pjkmorris. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Angelique Kasmara, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:54, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Angelique Kasmara

Hello, Pjkmorris. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Angelique Kasmara".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:47, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pjkmorris, I have restored the draft based on your request at Requests for Undeletion. If you have an external connection with the subject, you have a WP:Conflict of interest and will have to disclose the same. See WP:DISCLOSE for details, or you can message me if you require help. Thanks. Jay 💬 05:37, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I also see a discussion at Talk:Paula Morris which implies another disclosure is due. Jay 💬 05:37, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kia ora Jay: I taught Angelique at the University of Auckland (where I am as Associate Professor, running the Masters programme in creative writing); I also selected her work for the 2021 anthology I co-edited with Alison Wong, A Clear Dawn: New Asian Voices from Aotearoa New Zealand. If this precludes me from updating her entry, let me know and I'll find another writer to complete it. It's hard in NZ, where everyone in the literary world seems connected. Pjkmorris (talk) 05:52, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may edit the draft, since draftspace is different from article mainspace. The request here is for standard disclosures which will make your contributions transparent. Jay 💬 06:05, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Let me know if you still need help in making the disclosures. I have added the {{Connected contributor}} talk at Angelique Kasmara's talk page. And I believe the conversion at Talk:Paula Morris is still waiting for your response. Jay 💬 06:47, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you go through my links provided above, and do you have any questions? Jay 💬 07:12, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Angelique Kasmara (April 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Angelique Kasmara and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 11:15, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This entry has to be seen in the context of NZ literature, not by US standards of what constitutes "success". Also, many of the contemporary NZ writer entries are for poets, for whom publishing is much simpler in NZ and served by numerous small and university presses. All the citations here are from independent sources, including book reviews. I don't understand why this entry for an important Asian NZ voice is not acceptable when these are:

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarona_Aiono-Iosefa

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annaleese_Jochems (another writer who has only published one book)

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rose_Lu (again, just one book)

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tze_Ming_Mok (no books)

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebecca_K_Reilly (one book)

- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grace_Taylor_(poet) (one book) Pjkmorris (talk) 23:37, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Angelique Kasmara has been accepted

Angelique Kasmara, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MurielMary (talk) 01:54, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]