User talk:Phoenixdad

Why did you remove content

why did you remove content on Jhala dynasty. Colonel Tod too mentions that jhala is also called makwana Advancings (talk) 08:28, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DJ Ravish (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by QuantumRealm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DJ Ravish and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 10:57, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Phoenixdad! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 10:57, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 19:43, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another user deleted a list of politicians from the infobox in the article on Asansol. They said that it was not important for town. I see that you have reverted the deletion. Please could you use Talk:Asansol to explain why they need to be in the infobox.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Qayaamat Se Qayaamat Tak (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Qayaamat Se Qayaamat Tak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:09, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jhala dynasty

Hello, Phoenixdad,

You are blindly reverting edits and replacing a Proposed deletion tag on this article even though it was removed. This is disruptive editing. If you believe an editor is block-evading sockpuppet, then file an SPI complaint, don't go around reverting all of their work. This will only result in another block for you.

If you have questions about editing on Wikipedia, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:20, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Thakor Sumant Sinhji Jhala per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thakor Sumant Sinhji Jhala. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 15:48, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Qayaamat Se Qayaamat Tak has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Qayaamat Se Qayaamat Tak. Thanks! Xegma(talk) 08:32, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]