User talk:Omarghanim

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Omarghanim! Your additions to Draft:Joint British Diabetes Societies for Inpatient Care Group (JBDS-IP) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. CC-by-NC 4.0 is not a compatible license. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 00:15, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback. Will edit accordingly. Omarghanim (talk) 08:38, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello, I'm Tacyarg. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Diabetes UK, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The source you added was a primary source, and not in the correct format. Please be careful to make neutral statements, too. Tacyarg (talk) 01:33, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the note. Will correct. Omarghanim (talk) 06:54, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deprodding of Draft:Joint British Diabetes Societies for Inpatient Care Group

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Draft:Joint British Diabetes Societies for Inpatient Care Group, which you proposed for deletion. Drafts cannot be deleted using the WP:PROD process. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this draft should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the draft. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion; however, first please read Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion#Before nominating a page for deletion to see the guidelines. Thanks! TartarTorte 18:24, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Omarghanim (talk) 18:39, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ghanim Alsheikh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ghanim Alsheikh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:03, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t understand why the request for speedy deletion. The page was created to complement pages related to medical education in Iraq, an area not highlighted in Wikipedia. Omarghanim (talk) 10:39, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ghanim Alsheikh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghanim Alsheikh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghanim Alsheikh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 04:53, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your email

You did not indicate which article you were emailing about, but I presume it's Ghanim Alsheikh. As a contested PROD it can be restored without question, which I have done. But I'm also flagging for @Alexandermcnabb in the event they want to renominate it as consensus was that the subject is not notable. Do you have a connection here that you need to disclose? Star Mississippi 12:25, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for creating an article for this organization. Oaktree b (talk) 02:31, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Omarghanim (talk) 12:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Omarghanim. Thank you for your work on Association of British Clinical Diabetologists. User:Oaktree b, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

There are other sources in medical journals that might be useful to expand the article. I've noticed some in Pubmed from the NIH that would be helpful. We only have one source used, so the article needs to be expanded with further sourcing. Please message me if you need assistance with a Pubmed search.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Oaktree b}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Oaktree b (talk) 02:33, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the review. If you have a list of sources I would be grateful. 2A00:23C7:E71A:2601:3061:86A5:AB9:2492 (talk) 08:52, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Alumni of University of Mosul has been nominated for deletion

Category:Alumni of University of Mosul has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 16:51, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Ghanim Alsheikh

Hello Omarghanim, I thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Ghanim Alsheikh, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghanim Alsheikh (2nd nomination).

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Actualcpscm}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Actualcpscm^{scrutinize, talk} 20:06, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Association of British Clinical Diabetologists

Hello, Omarghanim. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Association of British Clinical Diabetologists, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]