User talk:Olatunbosun opeyemi David

Welcome!

Hello, Olatunbosun opeyemi David, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 22:27, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hemipolygona carinifera

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - Sumanuil (talk) 23:19, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Slow down please

this is wrong
this doesn't even exist.

ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 04:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Diego Valoyes and others

Please do NOT use the caption "Diego Valoyes Portrait" again. Write a real caption. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 13:57, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Marine Fauthoux. Last warning. If you can't write a decent caption, don't participate in this project. Drmies (talk) 14:01, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And don't use italics for captions. Thank you. I'm still assessing the quality of your captions: "Michal Skóras on the football field" is very sophomoric. And this is bad. Drmies (talk) 16:39, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Captions, captions, captions

When adding a standalone image, like you did in this edit, please add a meaningful caption that provides context. The year the image was taken, what the subject is doing, etc. For the Ernst Krause image, an example of a caption is "Krause in 1938 during his German Expedition to Tibet." Based on the discussions above, you may may be blocked and disqualified from WPWP if this continues. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 06:20, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Olatunbosun opeyemi David (talk) 10:45, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Majid bin Abdulaziz Al Saud

You added a wrong photo, it is of his father, so added it to the article stating this fact. Today you again inserted the same and incorrect photo. You may check the article and the person before inserting the photos to the articles, thank you, Egeymi (talk) 09:41, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ho! Thank you for the correction. Olatunbosun opeyemi David (talk) 09:58, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning

You have been re-inserting multiple bad images that were previously inserted by yourself or others and reverted. Among other things, you re-inserted this, which clearly was an image of a different person than the article subject. In other cases, you duplicated an image that was already in the article [1]. You really must stop doing this.

Before you add any image to any article, you must check the article's edit history to see if the same edit was done before. If somebody reverted the image out of the article, don't insert it again.
Of course, you also must look at the page before you edit it. If the image is already there, don't re-add it.
In general, please stop adding imaginary, non-contemporary depictions of historic personalities. They are usually not wanted on Wikipedia (see WP:PORTRAIT). The competition you're taking part in is only meant for photographs anyway, so there's really no point in adding those. Independently of the contest, if you haven't investigated when and how those images were created and aren't willing to provide an informative caption explaining them, don't insert them.

Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:50, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

You have done it again. Here and here you re-added images that were already on the page. Here you added an image of the wrong person (that's not Bette Ford, that's Bette Davis next to a Ford car).

I have blocked you for the remainder of the #wpwp contest period, and will ask for you to be disqualified from the contest. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:42, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for continued irresponsible image additions in the context of the #wpwp contest. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:38, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Block Appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Olatunbosun opeyemi David (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Admin, I'm really sorry for uploading a wrong picture, I now understand better what my roles are as a wikipedians. I will really appreciate if my account is unblocked so I continue editing. Thanks in advance Olatunbosun opeyemi David (talk) 12:07, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not convincing. What was the problem with the pictures you were uploading? How will you ensure you only upload appropriate pictures from now on? Yamla (talk) 14:02, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

Why are you adding one random reference to every politician’s page? Watercheetah99 (talk) 16:32, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Poor sourcing

Thank you for contributing to the article Mr. Ibu. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 14:45, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wothappenonline?

I see you added a link to Wothappenonline to the Nikki Amuka-Bird article. [2] What makes you think Wothappenonline is any kind of reliable source? Did you notice the part at the top of that page, https://www.wothappen.com/fascinating-facts-about-nikki-amuka-bird/ where it says "Home > Wikipedia > Fascinating facts about Nikki Amuka-Bird"? Honestly, that makes me suspect they're just recycling our article. --GRuban (talk) 21:17, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GRuban, GRB, yes indeed that’s a poor source lacking editorial oversight and a reputation for fact checking. Did you remove it? If not please you are more than free to do so, I’d check for possible spamming. Celestina007 (talk) 21:47, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GRB? Gamma ray burst? Grebo language? Gotta run bye? Anyway, yes, I did remove it, at least pending some evidence that this is a major newspaper or something, which it does not look like. --GRuban (talk) 12:53, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kemi Falani. ng

Hello OOD can I use that?, I noticed you’re adding references to Nigerian articles and I wanted to let you know that Kemi Falani blog is not a reliable source. (See: WP:RS). I would have gone to revert them but you have added tons of them. Please, refrain from adding them on biography of living person. For a list of Nigerian reliable sources, see this page. Happy editing! READING BEANS^{Talk to the Beans} 12:04, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]