User talk:Nsheetz

Hello!

Hello there, N6!

Are you a Rudd? I'm a Lloydie. DavidCBryant 01:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a Scurve, class of 2004. I picked into Blacker and joined Ricketts late in my frosh year. N6 02:07, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Mediation

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party has been accepted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/University of Phoenix.

For the Mediation Committee, Essjay (Talk)

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to open new mediation cases. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

This message delivered: 16:15, 28 December 2006 (UTC).

Thank you

Thank you for spotting and removing vandalism from my talk page. Cascadia 02:13, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the warning re: vacuouspoet. David D. (Talk) 06:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet

Some nutjob sockpuppet continues to lump us together. Do I know you? LOL. Orangemarlin 13:59, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We've both been editing on Evolution and its Talk page. I don't know of any other connection. N6 14:02, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can we remove these idiotic tags? Or does it require some administrator? And does any loser have a right to just push their agenda? Makes me want to just ignore this garbage. Orangemarlin 18:42, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The person who filed the Sockpupet complaint did not provide any good evidence. You should be able to remove the notices per Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry/Notes_for_the_suspect. Cascadia 19:44, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The standard isn't "good evidence"; it's "evidence". We are not within our rights to remove the tags. I've responded to my case by saying that it's clearly frivolous, and this should do equally well as a response for you. I have no problem waiting this out. N6 19:57, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the tag because it showed no evidence whatsoever, so it didn't even meet the standard of "evidence." I'm pretty upset since this user, who is probably a Sockpuppet itself, can make spurious claims based on nothing. Orangemarlin 23:33, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I don't see anything of your comments on this case. You might be thinking of the previous accusation. Orangemarlin 23:35, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence was provided in the form of pointing to our participation on Talk:Evolution and alleging suspicious similarities. The policy allowing you to remove the template is for when no evidence whatsoever--not even any text claiming to be evidence--is provided.

I did not comment on the N6 case because I'm not required or expected to. I did comment on the Orangemarlin case (linked from the template on my userpage).

--N6 23:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your comments. PurpleSunfish reverted my removal, but a administrator came and re-reverted it. It's now gone. I'm sure he'll get to yours soon. Please add comments here if you don't mind Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/VacuousPoet. We had to do this to get the sockpuppet case validated. This is complicated. Orangemarlin 02:06, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UoP RfM

Thanks for your comments. I feel like I'm talking to a brick wall here, and I'm beginning to wonder why on earth I ever allowed myself to become embroiled in a debate over the minutiae of WP policy in such an obvious case. N6 21:27, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. A forum with 12 people isn't really almost never a good place to link to, regardless of it's content. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 21:33, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cant get the point across?

I had the same experience. When I looked at his page, I realize why we had this situation.--Filll 21:21, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

UoP RfA

This is to serve as notice that I am filing for Arbitration. --Rdenke 07:33, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called N6. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name N6~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

01:42, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

16:45, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]