User talk:Norwood Wanderer

Being fair to both sides of the argument

I can't be bothered to argue with you over. You have 'butchered' a lot this article to suit your narrative. We all have a narrative on this, it is about finding a fair middle ground. It just so happens I agree with you on most of this, but Peter Manning is an historian. His book was detailed and well written even if some of us feel not totally accurate in places. However "our" side of the argument could also be flawed as quite a lot of it relies on newspaper articles which again due to how long ago it was and records at that time were sketchy, could also be argued against. Alan Horran (talk) 13:02, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crooked Billet, Penge has been accepted

Crooked Billet, Penge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 14:27, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]