Jump to content

User talk:Nolabob

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Nolabob, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Wizard191 (talk) 14:51, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hap Glaudi

[edit]

I left some feedback on the Requests for Feedback page, and did some minor edits to your draft (described in my comments). Be aware that a couple of your sources will not be considered "Reliable Sources". For example, on the page WP:RS in a discussion of "self-published sources", it says, "blogs ... are largely not acceptable". The so-called blog of Glaudi's fellow sportscaster may in reality be an article, and calling it a "blog" just the publisher's way of sounding current. But it is possible you will receive negative comments about this, so be prepared. If you can locate additional verification of any of the facts recited in your article from an additional mainstream news source (obituary perhaps), you should include it in your article to stave off problems. Nicely done article in my opinion. Tkotc (talk) 05:55, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

Puffin Lets talk! 11:08, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Mel Leavitt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

CharlieEchoTango (contact) 22:35, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

[edit]

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Nolabob/Charles C. Bass has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Charles C. Bass, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 17:45, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Charles C. Bass, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 18:04, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Dates?

[edit]

I was looking at the article on Adrien De Pauger -- good work, by the way -- and I compared it with fr.wiki's article on him, and they've got different dates for his death. You said June 9th, fr.wiki says June 21st. What's your source? DS (talk) 14:58, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The source of de Pauger's date of death is the September 26, 1954 article about de Pauger in the New Orleans Times Picayune newspaper, written by New Orleans historian Pie Dufour. Nolabob (talk) 00:24, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, a reference! I don't suppose it has a title? DS (talk) 03:00, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The article is called "Designer of New Orleans", in Pie Dufour's "A La Mode" column. Nolabob (talk) 23:50, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle

[edit]
Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited
Seattle Public Library

Yours, Maximilianklein (talk) 04:30, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

History of football in the south

[edit]

Thank you for your recent edits on Harry P. Gamble. As a graduate of Jesuit, you might find interest in Johnny Menville. If you are really interested on the broader subject of southern football during that time, William Lofland Dudley could use someone with a chemist's expertise, for my lack of sufficient chemistry studies makes an exhaustive account of his scientific contributions difficult. Cake (talk) 15:52, 3 October 2015 (UTC) Thank you for your note. I'll keep the suggestion about Dudley in mind. Much as I like Tulane and Jesuit, does Menville really meet Wikipedia's notability criteria? Nolabob (talk) 13:28, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A fair question, but I would say so. The strongest and first point is laid out in brief on the All-Southern article; i. e. before the SEC in 1933, and certainly before the death of Camp, they were equivalent to All-American designation, as such was impossible for southern players (cf. John Tigert's or Hunter Carpenter's various HOF profiles). Second, even if we take it as just like an All-SEC selection today, that is usually sufficient for an article. Menville was also a very versatile athlete, the best at his school (won the Porter Cup). He punted and also played defensive end (Jess Neely was another fellow I know more about who must've been regularly crushed when switched to DE). Cake (talk) 18:06, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I just made the article for William T. Daly who might interest you as an academic and athlete who gave his life to Louisiana. Cake (talk) 16:46, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:ArchiTech28/sandbox has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:ArchiTech28/sandbox. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 15:32, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

[edit]
Stop icon

When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to Mr. Bingle, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube or Sci-Hub, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:

  • If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
  • If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
  • If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:13, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The warning template I used is unnecessarily harsh, but Wikipedia does take this matter quite seriously. You might not have known that the video was not an official upload so I could understand the confusion. Thank you for trying to improve Wikipedia. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:15, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amistad Research Center (2) (January 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
There are not enough references, entire paragraphs and sections have none.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Nolabob, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amistad Research Center (2) has been accepted

[edit]
Amistad Research Center (2), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 04:22, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Teamwork Barnstar
I appreciate how you got in touch to work together on the Wendell Phillips (archaeologist) article! Cloud atlas (talk) 18:06, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Charles E. Fenner

[edit]

I thought you might be interested to know that I have been working on a draft under this name for a long time - but it turns out that it is a different Charles E. Fenner. The draft is now at Draft:Charles E. Fenner (judge). Cheers! BD2412 T 19:40, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@BD2412 Thanks for letting me know! I look forward to the publication of your article. The two are cousins. We'll establish links between each of the two articles once you are finished. Best regards, Nolabob (talk) 21:38, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year

[edit]
 Happy New Year
Dear Bob, Best wishes for 2020! Happy New Year! Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 16:58, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mary Mark Ockerbloom Thank you, Mary. I look forward to continued collaboration with you. Nolabob (talk) 00:17, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, Nolabob. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 00:31, 21 January 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Nolabob! You created a thread called Suggestions on an infobox to use? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Short descriptions

[edit]

Hi there. Short descriptions are supposed to be no longer than 40 characters long. Regards, Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 20:59, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome

[edit]

Always interested to learn more about NOLA, so thanks for sharing info about Curtis & Davis today. There was another drawings collection from Curtis at SEAA, but the link I added seemed most relevant to your article as it was a collection of drawings of buildings. I remember well the Saigon building in the news. MssLibrarian (talk) 22:38, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MssLibrarian:. Thank you for the upgrade to the article. Do you have a NOLA connection? Curious the reason for your particular interest in NOLA. Nolabob (talk) 01:15, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Nolabob:. Yes, parents married in 52 and moved there when mother obtained MSW from Tulane, father was civilian engineer for the Navy. Never lived there myself, but visited college friend several times in the 70s and many times more for conferences in later years. Mother's shrimp creole is a family favorite and Confederacy of Dunces is one of my all-time favorite books. Much to admire about the rich, colorful history and culture of the Crescent City. Laissez les bon temps rouler. MssLibrarian (talk) 17:47, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy new year!

[edit]
 Have a happy New Year!

May we all be happy, healthy, smart and kind in 2022!
Thank you for all you do.

Image: New Year's Eve Foxfires at the Changing Tree, Oji, Utagawa Hiroshige, woodcut, 1857

Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 23:23, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Christian Street Historic District

[edit]

On 1 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Christian Street Historic District, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the proposed Christian Street Historic District (building pictured), originally settled by Irish immigrants, is also known as "Black Doctors' Row"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Christian Street Historic District. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Christian Street Historic District), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 12:02, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Hook update
Your hook reached 5,293 views (441.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 01:06, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Louisiana Endowment for the Humanities.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Louisiana Endowment for the Humanities.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Saint. Stephen Church, New Orleans

[edit]

Hi. I note that St. Stephen Church in Uptown New Orleans was recently promoted to a basilica. We don't have an article for it; I think that might be a good addition. There's a category with a fair number of images existent on Commons

Wikimedia Commons has media related to St._Stephen_Church,_New_Orleans.

Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 00:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the suggestion. I'll definitely look into this. However, I'm distracted with some family matters at the moment, so it might be toward the end of the summer before there's significant progress. Nolabob (talk) 10:38, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sure thing. You're good at such local articles. Depending on what else occupies my attention, I might create a starter article before then. Best wishes, -- Infrogmation (talk) 14:55, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Preference that I start the article, within my "sandbox" and then move it to article space when it is ready for public viewing. I hope that's ok with you. Incidentally, you've piqued my curiosity about this subject and I may start sooner than I thought. Nolabob (talk) 15:01, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Curtis Imrie

[edit]

On 9 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Curtis Imrie, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Curtis Imrie won three world championships as a pack burro racer? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Curtis Imrie. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Curtis Imrie), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jean-Louis Dolliole

[edit]

Incredible work on Jean-Louis Dolliole. Just stopping by to tell you that. Anwegmann (talk) 15:06, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Anwegmann Thank you! I much appreciate your saying so. Nolabob (talk) 17:34, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Special Barnstar
I don't think I've given someone a barnstar in recent times, and you are the first person that came to mind. I haven't seen as much patience, kindness and civility in most elite reviewers as I have seen with you. I hope you have a happy journey for reviewing and further more best to come.

Thanks once again for your all cooperation and support at Golconda diamonds. :)

Omer123hussain (talk) 08:25, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sesame allergy GA review

[edit]

Thank you for beginning the GA review of this article. David notMD (talk) 12:51, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyediting - I am, perhaps, too close to the article to do a decent copyediting pass-through. I would appreciate it if you would take on this task, either now or when all of the other to-do items have been addressed. David notMD (talk) 15:24, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I understand completely. I will take on the copyediting task per your request in a day or two as the review progresses. At this time, I'm working on the spot check of the citations. Nolabob (talk) 16:10, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am addressing the last of the queries today. I will add a note here when done. If, on a final read-through, more questions arise, please leave a note on my Talk page so I can revisit. I appreciate your attention to detail and patience. On the former, looks like I should revisit the food allergy articles previously raised to GA, to improve those. On the latter, there have been some personal distractions - including a wildfire not too far from our daughter's place in California (happily now contained) - so I am glad that we are nearing the end of the process. David notMD (talk) 14:06, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
All outstanding requests addressed. David notMD (talk) 13:03, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will be incorporating the improvements made in response to your review of the Sesame allergy GA nomination to the Milk allergy, Egg allergy, Fish allergy and [[Shellfish allergy] articles I had previously raised to GA (different reviewers see different things). Including better Infoboxes. David notMD (talk) 17:05, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Very good! I'm glad the improvements to the Sesame allergy article will be extended to these other articles. Nolabob (talk) 18:03, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

LaPlace Louisiana

[edit]

I'm planning a visit to LaPlace Louisiana next week, mostly to see the Woodland Plantation's reincarnation as the 1811/Kid Ory Museum. Letting you know in case you have any requests for me to photograph in that area. (I'm not expecting to go much further upriver nor to the West Bank.) Leave a message on my Commons talk page if so. Keep up your good work! Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 04:04, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for thinking of me and for your positive feedback. I don't have any specific projects in mind related to LaPlace. One thing that comes to mind has to do with nearby Norco, Louisiana. Its Wikipedia page has little in the way of photographs. Maybe a few photos related to Norco, if that's not inconvenient? Thanks! Nolabob (talk) 10:43, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

[edit]

Hi Nolabob. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 04:22, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pay Toilets

[edit]

Pay Toilets is an off-shoot of Draft:Great Toilet Battle which in turn is derived from Youtube Great Toilet Battle Great Toilet Battle (Deutsche Welle uploaded to YT) (2022-10-08)

This 42minute long YT film features some of the following actors, people and things and is deadly serious about lifting hundreds of millions out of third world unsewered filth, a worthy cause if ever there was one:

  • I do not mind you moving Pay Toilets to Draft space..

Do I need to cite more? ----MountVic127 (talk) 17:38, 2 November 2022 (UTC) MountVic127 (talk) 17:38, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a statement of the Wikipedia policy on citing Youtube. Considering what you said about this project, I suggest looking for other reliable sources beyond Youtube. A brief Google search indicates that there are New York Times and Wall Street Journal articles about Gates's effort to improving sanitation in the Third World. Nolabob (talk) 19:16, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deutsche Welle (DW) is a reputable broadcaster like the BBC and Australia's ABC and SBS; the Great Toilet Battle happens to be an upload to youtube of this article. In hindsight I could have named the relevant files "DW GTB" rather than "YT GTB" but this is too late to change.

I searched DW and found an index of programs that have made and the nearest to GTB is "Great Barrier Reef"; clearly they have yet to update this index.

While much of youtube maybe trivial, rubbish, labourious, spam or worse, the "Great Toilet Battle" from DW is genuine and worthy of citation.

DYK nomination of Herman Neugass

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Herman Neugass at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:51, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Herman Neugass

[edit]

On 9 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Herman Neugass, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that track and field star Herman Neugass boycotted the 1936 US Olympic Trials because of rising antisemitism in Nazi Germany? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Herman Neugass. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Herman Neugass), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Edith Rosenwald Stern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Edith Rosenwald Stern you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lajmmoore -- Lajmmoore (talk) 20:41, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking on this task. Nolabob (talk) 00:32, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Edith Rosenwald Stern

[edit]

The article Edith Rosenwald Stern you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Edith Rosenwald Stern and Talk:Edith Rosenwald Stern/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lajmmoore -- Lajmmoore (talk) 08:02, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Edith Rosenwald Stern

[edit]

The article Edith Rosenwald Stern you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Edith Rosenwald Stern for comments about the article, and Talk:Edith Rosenwald Stern/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lajmmoore -- Lajmmoore (talk) 15:01, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023

[edit]

Hello Nolabob,

New Page Review queue December 2022
Backlog

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2022 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

DYK for Edith Rosenwald Stern

[edit]

On 22 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Edith Rosenwald Stern, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sears heiress Edith Rosenwald Stern organized a women's broom brigade against political corruption in New Orleans? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Edith Rosenwald Stern. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Edith Rosenwald Stern), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External academic review and publication of Wikipedia pages

[edit]

Hi Nolabob. In case you'd not come across it before, I thought I'd message to ask whether there are any wikipedia articles that you'd be interested in creating/updating/overhauling and submitting for external, academic peer review.

The WikiJournal of Science (www.wikijsci.org) couples the rigour of academic peer review with the extreme reach of the encyclopedia. For existing Wikipedia articles, it's a great way to get additional feedback from external experts. Peer-reviewed articles are dual-published both as standard academic PDFs, as well as having changes integrated back into Wikipedia. This improves the scientific accuracy of the encyclopedia, and rewards authors with citable, indexed publications. It also provides much greater reach than is normally achieved through traditional scholarly publishing.

Note that we do have to publish under real names, so if you don't want your real name associated to your username, you may have to choose atopic that your username has not previously edited.

Anyway, let me know whether you'd be interested in putting an article through academic peer review (either solo, or with a team of coauthors).

All the best, T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 10:14, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

José Inácio de Abreu e Lima

[edit]

I will let you remove your edits to Cemitério dos Ingleses, Gamboa (in Rio de Janiero) please add them to Cemitério dos Ingleses (in Recife) where he is actually buried. Will be good for the article to have reference. regards Richard Bruce Bradford (talk) 23:25, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the edits made in error. Thank you for calling this to my attention and allowing me to fix my own error. Regards, Nolabob (talk) 13:37, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Langenstein's

[edit]

Good day. I notice that the Langenstein's article is up for deletion. I'm not sure if it's notable outside of Greater New Orleans, but I'm sure more could be added to the article if you think it a worthy subject to save. I do know that there are pix of each of the locations on Commons. Red beans & ricely, -- Infrogmation (talk) 22:45, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll have a look at it tomorrow. I'll determine if I can address the notability concern and also the ad-like tone of the article. On a personal note, my parents were acquaintances with the owners of Langenstein's, although ironically my parents did not shop there. My parents and their Langenstein acquaintances are long since past, so there is no COI. Thanks for calling this to my attention. Nolabob (talk) 23:26, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Great. I did a few quick additions. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 23:29, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've done some work on the Langenstein's article. Please have a look to see if you have other suggestions for the article. Otherwise, I might remove both the stub tag and the nomination for deletion tag, and notify the user that nominated it for deletion. Thanks! Nolabob (talk) 12:35, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Good work. I just removed the deletion tag. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 20:21, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I've removed the Stub tag as well. Nolabob (talk) 22:42, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I notice I neglected to give you an appreciation award for your work before, so I'll do so now:
A New Orleans tip of the hat

I hereby present you with The N.J.Clesi "I Love You, My New Orleans" Award for Excellence in New Orleans Related Articles. Congratulations, and keep up the good work! -- Infrogmation (talk) 16:45, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive

[edit]
New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 May, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of redirects patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive.
  • Article patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Sign up here!
  • There is a possibility that the drive may not run if there are <20 registered participants. Participants will be notified if this is the case.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023

[edit]

Hello Nolabob,

New Page Review queue April to June 2023

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

New pages patrol needs your help!

[edit]
New pages awaiting review as of June 30th, 2023.

Hello Nolabob,

The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

[edit]
Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Nolabob. Thank you for your work on New Orleans Arts and Crafts Club. User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article. There are a couple instances of copyvios/close paraphrasing which should probably be cleaned up. [1]

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 23:49, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Netherzone:, Thank you for your note and for your new page review. I believe that I have properly addressed the issues that you identified. Nolabob (talk) 11:59, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect! They were minor, and it looks fine now. Netherzone (talk) 15:29, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive

[edit]
New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol newsletter

[edit]

Hello Nolabob,

New Page Review article queue, March to September 2023

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November Articles for creation backlog drive

[edit]

Hello Nolabob:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 1100 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive

[edit]
New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
  • On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

[edit]
Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

[edit]

Hello Nolabob,

New Page Review queue January to March 2024

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

[edit]
New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
  • On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

French Quarter institutions

[edit]

Thanks for your work on Solari's! Great job! Meanwhile, the Arnaud's article was proposed for deletion as out of scope and looking like advertising. I made some edits to improve it and removed the PROD notice, but it certainly could use further improvement. Should you have time and inclination, your skills with New Orleans culture & history articles would be welcome. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 18:50, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. And thanks for the heads-up about the Arnaud's article. It certainly needs further work. Is there any urgency on this? I could work on it slowly among other commitments but it might take me until the end of the summer to finish the improvements. Thanks again. Nolabob (talk) 19:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I *think* it isn't urgent at this time. I think I've gotten it up to mediocrity adequate for the short term. Red beans & ricely, -- Infrogmation (talk) 22:58, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Per your suggestion, I have conducted extensive revisions to the article about Arnaud's. I believe the tone is much more "encyclopedic" and largely without promotional tone. There are still one or two primary sources in the article, but this may be unavoidable. Please have a critical look and let me know if there is anything else I should do on this article. Thanks again for the suggested topic. Nolabob (talk) 12:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Infrogmation, I have completed my revisions to the Arnaud's article. Please let me know if there is anything else I should do on this article or any other topics. Nolabob (talk) 12:40, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

[edit]
New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Nolabob. Thank you for your work on Solari's. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:40, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nolabob&oldid=1244461717"