User talk:Mxhyn16

Welcome!

Hello, Mxhyn16, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GPL93 (talk) 21:22, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Whiteguru. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Whiteguru (talk) 20:12, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Legacies (TV series), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. — YoungForever^(talk) 01:21, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jerry Bruckheimer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gemini Man. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trauma (I Prevail album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, you may be blocked from editing. The AllMusic genre could is not a reliable source for genres and should never be used. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:51, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You continue to make the same changes, and do so without explanation. Both need to stop. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:35, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know I'm sorry about. It's just it kinda feels weird to separate the genres by using commas. I feel like putting in flatlist just makes it more suitable. I hope you understand. Please don't block me. I just want to improve something. Mxhyn16 (talk) 06:38, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't block you if I tried. Lists are lists, and comma are commas. Feel free to read the documentation at {{Infobox musical artist}}. Long unformatted lists are beneficial for those who use screen readers, but too many people treat them as decoration, which they aught not to be. The rest of your work is good though! Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:40, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So you know

I’ve put in a protection request for Scream 2022. Had a feeling the vandalism would increase. Sure there were registered users restoring the unverified summary, but especially since it’s now multiple IPs, it felt right--CreecregofLife (talk) 06:32, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question

You just made a series of ≈20 consecutive edits to Halo (TV series), starting with the addition of ≈40,000 bytes of content, which was then whittled down to -4 bytes, and a visible difference of minor changes to four words. You didn't leave any edit summaries, nor is there any comments from you on the article talk page that would explain this unusual editing. It would be helpful to do so in the future. Also, instead of blowing up the page history, and all the watchpages of editors monitoring this page, could I suggest that in the future that you use the preview function to make changes while limiting the number of actual edits, or work on the content in your User:Mxhyn16/sandbox, then transfer the finalized version to the article with a single edit. Please keep these suggestions in mind going forward, thank you. - wolf 07:23, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to fix the page because it wasn't constructive. So I copy and paste the last page for a manual revert. But I accidentally double up the page. I didn't even notice because I thought it didn't work. I was using my phone to fix the page. Using a computer would've been easier, but I had use my phone because it was getting late. I'm sorry about that. Hope you understand. Thank you Mxhyn16 (talk) 17:17, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a particular reason why the edit was deemed "Completely unnecessary" to the point of reverting everything? I am using guidelines to help expand the "Reception" part of the article, and I am citing a variety of different sources ensure that the article is well versed, instead of being pulled out of no where; plus as per Snowmanonahoe "at least provide a source(s)" which I have been. Reception to a show is important to any wiki page on media, such a movie or tv show, and just leaving it "oh it's all positive" without putting in any level and counterbalance of "but there are some criticisms" is biased. Whatever concerns and criticism fans may have with the show, I am not using fan reaction on social media but actual critic and other publisher articles to add to the point. Literally on a section in a TV article about Reception, deleting sourced criticism and only leaving in the "it's all good man, nothing to see here but positivieity and rainbows" is counterproductive, biased, and not servicing the article nor the world of media and associated praise and criticism. Mxhyn16 [[User:Duyneuzaenasagae|Duyneuzaenasagae] — Preceding undated comment added 16:35, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Using someone else's tweet as a BLP source

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:54, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please assume good faith and do not use offensive language towards other editors like you did [1]. LancedSoul (talk) 19:54, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I totally understand. I know I'm not supposed to offensive language toward other editors. It's just I can't do everything myself. Someone has to do it.

The Last of Us (TV series)

Hello, I noted that the use of % isn't been used, but it was reverted because it is against MOS:PERCENT. CastJared (talk) 14:58, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm CastJared. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Last of Us (TV series) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CastJared (talk) 03:14, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Last of Us (TV series), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. CastJared (talk) 03:14, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Thanksgiving (2023 film), you may be blocked from editing. Grachester (talk) 01:57, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Castlevania (TV series). Please don't re-add genres without sources. Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:46, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Jenna Ortega.~~ Sundayclose (talk) 02:02, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just realized that it was changed to 2024. Have you heard of edit summaries that might prevent this kind of misinterpretation? Sundayclose (talk) 02:07, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I heard, I just forgot to put it in why I changed it. I put 2024 because the Emmys was delayed due to the strike. Mxhyn16 (talk) 02:10, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello, I'm Rehsarb. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Monarch: Legacy of Monsters that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rehsarb (talk) 23:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Halo

Can you explain why you reverted this, please? -- Alex_21_TALK 05:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While I do feel like edit was in good faith, I felt that there was no need to improve the Halo page. The edit you made had no impact. For example, you added a reference in season 2 in the series overview. Having that reference was unnecessary and doesn't serve an impact. That's why I reverted your edit. It just doesnt serve any purpose. Mxhyn16 (talk) 07:57, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have explained why that reference is there, and it is required per policy. However, "I can see nothing wrong with the article and there is no need to change anything at all" is not a valid reason to revert; I also made other edits to the article, all of which were valid. -- Alex_21_TALK 10:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Monarch: Legacy of Monsters. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 04:52, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

I've noticed you've done some reverts of good faith edits are Fallout (American TV series) without a reason. You're also pushing up against WP:3RR. Be mindful. -- ferret (talk) 01:50, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see this is still an issue. Please begin explaining your reverts and undoes. -- ferret (talk) 03:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why I reverted it was because it looked unconstructive to me. One of the sources were spaced out and not together. Also, we already have too many sources so we don't have to include all three of them. We can keep one and remove the two. Removing the space is fine and valid. However, there is no "limit" on sources. Sourcing something that isn't sourced should always be done, and usually people like to see at least two citations, whether the article has 30, 100 or even 300 sources already. These sources are likely valid for reuse in other places as well. -- ferret (talk) 03:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You are blocked for 3 days for edit warring and personal attacks/incivility. Sergecross73 msg me 23:27, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, so I noticed that I've been blocked for 3 days. Let me clarify the whole situation to you. I did not see his edits as good faith. I saw that as vandalism because he put 🐂💩 and ask people to prove him wrong for the citation. I reverted his edits and he reverted mine. That's when I immediately lost my cool from that and I shouted some explicit words to him. I also forgot about the 3RR since I reverted his edits for about 4 times. I realize I was in the wrong and I never should have lost my temper from that. I should have use the talk page instead of having to edit warring with him. I am deeply sorry for the troubles I have caused. If you do not want to unblock me, that's totally understandable. I took a break from Wikipedia for a month after a previous situation. I can handle having not to edit for 3 days. Mxhyn16 (talk) 23:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation. It is good to see that you have the awareness of what happened to be able to write that explanation above. It makes me hopeful that this won't be an issue moving forward. If taking a month off in the past has helped, I do think taking a bit of time off to wait for the block to be expire would be helpful in this case too. (Not a month, just the 3 days.) Sergecross73 msg me 13:22, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Verge (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alternative Press.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fallout TV logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fallout TV logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:19, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fallout TV logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fallout TV logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase Five, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Trailblazer101 (talk) 19:07, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know that the * was supposed to be a part of the page because I thought it was out of place for some reason. I immediately assumed that the * should not be there. My apologies. Mxhyn16 (talk) 19:12, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The official title of the film is "Thunderbolts*" with the asterisk. This is explained in the article, Thunderbolts*. I know it's weird, just wanted to point it out. Trailblazer101 (talk) 19:14, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Logo change reverts Prime/Prime Video

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Amazon Prime. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Amazon Prime Video. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Whether you like the new logo or not is not relevant here. Amazon is currently rolling out the new design in batches. So it can be that the changes are not yet visible in your country or for your Amazon account. See amazon.de: https://imgur.com/a/SwSa6kU Infanf (talk) 08:13, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Also watch your language please Infanf (talk) 08:18, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infanf, the changes I looked at were all drive-by changes, unexplained, by IP editors, so I can understand some of the frustration, and I'm sure you understand why I semi-protected the article. On the other hand, Mxhyn, "STOP CHANGING THE FUCKING LOGO?!? IT'S NOT AN IMPROVEMENT!?!" is just really not acceptable, okay? Drmies (talk) 14:45, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Please read WP:REVERT, WP:EDITWAR and WP:TALK, and take note of editors' edit summaries. There are better ways of reaching consensus on the wording of an article than reverting because you don't like it. I happen to regard the release date of a production as important information which should appear in the first line because that is what appears in Google searches, among other things. We should be guiding a reader to the correct article as quickly as possible. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:15, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]