User talk:Mordgier

Just a quick reminder...

...to sign your posts the first time around! --I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 22:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Jetstar Airways

My apologies for removing the "Controversies" section, I had only done so because I felt that it may be something Wikipedia wouldn't want on its' articles, as it could cause feuds and rumours internal to this website. No harm was intended in its' removal. 211.27.43.137 (talk) 21:21, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You may have a point yet it's been around for some time now and as long as the statements have verifiable sources there is little grounds for their removal. Also I'd suggest you register as anonymous edits are much more likely to be reverted instead of being discussed than logged in ones.Mordgier (talk) 21:30, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Duly noted, registration made! I also made slight alterations to the section mentioned. An unrelated source was removed, and an incident has been separated into its' own paragraph, as it had no relation to the paragraph it was initially attached to. In summary, I cleaned the section up a little. Thanks. ClarkeSYD (talk) 21:45, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for rollback

Hi Mordgier. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:00, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revision to Lima article

Hey, thanks for spotting the vandalism. The picture of the slums (on Cerro San Cristobal) is still missing from the article. I don't know if you know, but there was a vigorous debate about whether that image should stay or go. Established editors decided it should stay, and it's been the subject of edit wars and vandalism ever since. Rafajs77 (talk) 00:47, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revision to Kansas State Men's Basketball article

The actual name of the arena they play in is "Allen Fieldhouse West" not "Bramlage Coliseum", this is a common misconception that needs to be changed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.11.42.241 (talk) 23:12, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you provide any reliable source I'll be happy to change it myself. Failing that, it's an unverifiable change and vandalism. Mordgier (talk) 00:06, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]