User talk:Malcolmo

Do not add false information

You seem to have a bad habit of adding false information to Wikipedia pages. Your recent edits to the page for One Republic's song "Apologize" included a number of misstatements in the author, description, and release information. Repitition of such edits will be considered vandalism and reported accordingly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.9.8.150 (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nochmals ...

Mariah-Charts.com ist KEINE zuverlässige Quelle ...
Alle Quellenangaben, die du bezüglich der Verlaufzahlen auf Brandy discography angegeben haben, sind NICHT ZUVERLÄSSIG - das sind Fanseiten oder für jedermann zugängliche Edit-Seiten, auf der jeder Schreiben kann was wer will.
VH1 Divas ist kein Brandy-Album! Die Platte ist eine Live-Compilation verschiedener Artists und enthält keine Original-Tracks, sondern Songs, die zu damaligem Zeitpunkt bereits auf Never Say Never veröffentlicht waren (siehe Vh1 Divas 1998)
Ich weiß nicht, was dir daran liegt, Lügen zu verbreiten, aber "Sweet Nothing" ist zu keinem Zeitpunkt bisher als Single angekündigt worden. Nur weil eine Radiostation den Song mal spielt, heißt das noch lange nicht, das er veröffentlicht wird, geschweige denn, dass man deswegen einen Artikel bei Wikipedia deswegeb aufmachen muss.

- Noboyo

1. Schau dir doch mal das hier durch.

1. Ich denke laut.de kann nicht irgendjemand bearbeiten

1. VH1 Divas chartet als Whitney/Cher/Tina/Brandy und nicht Verschiedene Interpreten. Außerdem... ein Live-Album enthält so gut wie nie neue Songs - Sie sind einfach live - The Best of Brandy enthält auch "nur" alte Songs.

1. Der Song ist auf der offiziellen Myspace Seite von Maximum Risk zu hören und wird in Radiostationen gespielt außerdem steht auf der Myspace Seite dass der Song auf Brandy's kommenden 2007er Album enthalten wird. Das ist zumindest eine Buzz-Single. Es ist der einzige komplett veröggentlichte Song des neuen albums. Der Rest: Snippets.

Antwort

Wie ich bereits sagte: Mariah-Charts.com ist ein von Fans iniziiertes Archiv, das richtig sein mag, aber keinerlei Richtigkeit garantiert (Bitte versteh doch: Swisscharts.com oder Billboard.biz werden öffentlich betrieben, M-C.com ist eine Privatseite/Fanpage) ...
Laut.de anzufügen ist nicht falsch, aber im englischsprachigen Wikipedia deutsche Reviews beizufügen is' dann doch eher unnütz, somal denn genügend englischsprachige Kritiken vorliegen. (Anmerkung: Bei Artikeln mit deutschem Bezug wie zum Beispiel Temptation (Monrose album) is' das natürlich anders zu betrachten, denn dazu existieren so gut wie keine englischen Reviews)
VH1 Divas ist eine Reihe von Compilations, die ähnlich wie DisneyMania o.ä. erscheinen/erschienen sind und nicht als einzelnes Album der Interpreten Whitney/Cher/Tina/Brandy gelten (man kann sich in diesem Fall nicht nur auf den Eintrag von Swisscharts.com etc. berufen). Das Album wurde niemals als Extra-Album in der Discography der offiziellen Seite Brandys (brandyforever.com) aufgeführt, genauso wenig wie alle Dutzend Interpretinnen ihr Erscheinen auf den Divas-Alben zwischen 1998 und 2004 offensichtlich als eigenes Live-Album verstehen.
Sogar eine Buzz-Single muss irgendwo als solche tituliert werden. Nur weil ein Song im Radio gespielt wird (i.ü.: Last.fm ist kein Radiosender!), heißt das noch lange nicht, dass du ihn zur Buzz-Single ernennen kannst. Auch hier musst du verlässliche Quellen angeben (KEINE FANSEITEN, FOREN ODER INOFFIZIELLE SEITEN!!), die den Song als Buzz-Single betsetätigen, d.h. die dies auch sagen.
Bitte akzeptiere, dass deine Quellen auf Brandy discography keine verlässlichen Quellenangaben sind! Es ist toll, dass du dir so viel mühe machst und danach forschst, aber diese Zahlen sind nicht zulässig, solange sie nicht aus offizieller Hand sind.
Bitte hör auch Full Moon (album) zurückzusetzen, deine Revisions löschen zulässiges Quellenmaterial. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noboyo (talk • contribs) 16:46, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Brandybook.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Brandybook.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:56, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Brandytop.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Brandytop.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 18:57, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add false information

Thanks for experimenting with the page List of artists who reached number one on the U.S. Dance chart‎ on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. - eo 20:55, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brandy does not belong on this list

The List of artists who reached number one on the U.S. Dance chart pertains to the Hot Dance Club Play chart. It has nothing to do with the Maxi-Singles Sales chart. Please stop adding incorrect info here. Thanks. - eo 21:06, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Christmas everyday.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Christmas everyday.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:00, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...

Um Himmels Willen, wie oft soll ich dich denn noch (fruendlichst) darauf aufmerksam machen, dass U Don't Know Me eine EP und kein Album ist, und damit nichts in der Alben-Chronologie zu suchen hat. Man fügt diese ja auch nicht in die Singles-Chronologie ein ... - Noboyo —Preceding comment was added at 21:04, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mensch... kennst du denn nicht die Chronologien von Mariah Carey, Beastie Boys, Beyonce, Madonna, Jay-Z, Robyn, En Vogue, Linkin Park oder auch Alice in Chains !

Ich habe bereits öfters angemerkt, dass mich Fehler in anderen Artikeln nicht interessieren und das du dir dies nicht als Begründung zu nütze machen solltest - Noboyo —Preceding comment was added at 22:28, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DawninOneShot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:DawninOneShot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:17, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Brandy - Hi-Five.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Brandy - Hi-Five.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:47, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Brandy-Profile.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Brandy-Profile.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:50, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Formalinvite.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Formalinvite.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:37, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Iwannabedown.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Iwannabedown.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:46, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:In the air tonite.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:In the air tonite.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:30, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Judges of idol westafrica.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Judges of idol westafrica.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:42, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nottonight.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nottonight.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:22, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Markmedlock.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Markmedlock.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:52, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:DawninOneShot.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:DawninOneShot.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:34, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Boy band. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Fizzgog (talk) 15:20, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wieder einmal ...

Mit "Entry" beruft sich LesCharts.com auf den Einstieg/das Erscheinen des Albums und nicht (!) der Single, wie du dem Chartverlauf unter der Tracklist auf eben jener Seite entnehmen kannst. Nochmals: "Afrodisiac" wurde NACH "Who Is She 2 U" (global gesehen) veröffentlicht ...
Timbaland is nicht auf "Who Is She 2 U" als offizielles Feature angegeben (wie du dem Booklet entnehmen kannst), ich wäre dir also dankbar, wenn du ihn nicht ständig hinzulisten würdest.
"Sweet Nothings" ist bisher zu keiner Zeit als Single angekündigt worden (auch wenn manche Foren noch so viel gegensprüchliches sagen). Also bitte: Belass es dabei, den Track nicht als Single hinzuzufügen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noboyo (talk • contribs) 17:12, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gähn ...

Aus einem meiner älteren Einträge: "VH1 Divas ist eine Reihe von Compilations, die ähnlich wie DisneyMania o.ä. erscheinen/erschienen sind und nicht als einzelnes Album der Interpreten Whitney/Cher/Tina/Brandy gelten. Das Album wurde niemals als Extra-Album in der Discography der offiziellen Seite Brandys (brandyforever.com) aufgeführt, genauso wenig wie alle Dutzend Interpretinnen ihr Erscheinen auf den Divas-Alben zwischen 1998 und 2004 offensichtlich als eigenes Live-Album verstehen. Ich bitte dich also inständig, dies zu akzeptieren und es damit endlich (!) beruhen zu lassen.
Sätze wie ".. und wird nun als 'mögliche' Single gehandelt ..." sind auf Wikipedia ein absolutes No-Go - und das ist meinerseits absolut nicht böse gemeint, ich möchte dich nur darauf hinweisen. Ich weiß allerdings auch nicht, wie du immer darauf kommst, dass geleakte Songs gleich als Singles released werden, nur weil mal in Foren oder auf MySpace darüber gesprochen wird.
Wo wir gerade dabei sind: MySpace ist keine zuverlässige Quelle! Insbesondere dann nicht, wenn es sich im Privatnutzer handelt, d.h. die Seite nicht als offizielle Seite eines Interpreten gilt bzw. von diesem geleitet wird. Dieses Tatsache erkennst du auch an der Botschaft, die angezeigt wird, wenn du versuchst MySpace-Adressen in das Sources-Template einzugeben.

Danke schön ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noboyo (talk • contribs) 16:47, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Waitaminuterayj.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Waitaminuterayj.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Waitaminuterayj2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Waitaminuterayj2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:12, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TVAllstars.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TVAllstars.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:04, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Remixep.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Remixep.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:35, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Vh1divas99.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Vh1divas99.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:06, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Whyilie.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Whyilie.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:26, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Whatineedrayj.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Whatineedrayj.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:RayJ album.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RayJ album.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Brandy2007.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Brandy2007.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:VH1Divas1999.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:VH1Divas1999.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:30, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

=you have done this before.....

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to List of artists who reached number one on the Hot 100 (United States), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - eo (talk) 15:00, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Brandy2007.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Brandy2007.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Carlosguitar ^{(ready and willing)} 15:38, 24 December 2007 (UTC) --Carlosguitar ^{(ready and willing)} 15:38, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There we are ...

Hi. Deine Bemühungen um die Brandy-Artikel sollen in allen Ehren gehalten werden; aber wie ich mit gut erinnere (und du auch deiner Talkpage entnehmen kannst), hatten (!) wir bereits geklärt, dass Mariah-Chart.com keine zulässige Quellenangabe ist. Des Weiteren sind die Tokio Hot 100 keine offiziellen Airplay-Charts, sondern die Airplay-Auflistungen des einzelnen (!) Radiosender J-Wave, d.h. sie sind nicht relevant für Wikipedia (ganz egal, ob die jetzt in anderen Artikeln aufgelistet sind! Du würdest ja auch nicht die Hit Radio FFH-Charts hier nicht posten) ... In diesem Sinne nehme ich die Änderungen wieder raus, okay? Danke, Noboyo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noboyo (talk • contribs) 21:24, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dann will ich dich bitten - somal dir danach liegt - die angebliche "Quelle" aus dem deutschen WP zu entfernen. Wie gesagt: Ich will nur deutlich machen, dass WP Regeln hat, und man diese im Interesse von guten, fehlerfreien Artikeln beachten sollte - undabhängig davon, ob das irgendwo anders eben "falscherweise" genutzt wird. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noboyo (talk • contribs) 21:37, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tiny Kong.PNG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tiny Kong.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:22, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Ray J Un-Kut

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Ray J Un-Kut, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Ray J Un-Kut is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Ray J Un-Kut, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:30, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Thevideos.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Thevideos.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:45, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keyshia Cole discography

If you have additional chart information to place in a discography, please ADD it to what is already shown in the table. Please do not replace (remove) a column with your data without any type of explanation as to why. - eo (talk) 16:19, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your reason(s) for removing Austria make sense, however, you never enter any edit summaries, so there is no way for anyone to know what you're doing or why. If you're going to do something like this, please just write an edit summary or a quick note on the Talk Page. - eo (talk) 16:31, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:User Brandy

A tag has been placed on Template:User Brandy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:24, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Brandylive.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Brandylive.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:55, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brandy

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Brandy discography, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Thank you. Admc2006 (talk) 17:48, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Germany Invitation

Hello, Malcolmo! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be.

--Zeitgespenst (talk) 14:10, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here I Stand (Usher album)

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Here I Stand (Usher album). Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 13:10, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rename of Sleep On It

In the future, please discuss such a rename before implementing. The song you replaced the page with does not meet WP:MUSIC and is not notable, so it should not even have an article, much less replace the article of a notable television series. I have redirected Sleep On It to the television series, and the song article was moved to Sleep On It (song) and redirected back to the album article per WP:MUSIC. Again, before doing such a drastic action in the future, I strongly suggest you start a discussion on the talk page first to ensure that what you are planning is appropriate, and in keeping with Wikipedia guidelines. Collectonian (talk) 19:01, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SittinUpInMyRoom.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SittinUpInMyRoom.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 14:30, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback of Angels (song)

Just to let you know I rolled back your edits to the above article as per WP:D I feel that people typing in Angels (song) would expect the Robbie Williams song. The disambiguation page linked to was one Angel (disambiguation) and mostly the other notable songs on this disambiguation page were called Angel not Angels, so I see no need for the Angles (song) redirect target to be that page. If you disagree I'm most open to discussion. Thanks Rambo's Revenge (talk) 10:04, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:1minman.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:1minman.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:11, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Donkey Kong games by genre

I have nominated List of Donkey Kong games by genre, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Donkey Kong games by genre. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 19:36, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Brandy-(everything i do) i do it for you s.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Brandy-(everything i do) i do it for you s.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 11:28, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:In the air tonite.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:In the air tonite.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shake Your Pom Pom

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Shake Your Pom Pom, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Ching-a-Ling. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:42, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you are trying to write another article based on the Ching-a-Ling article model then do it in your sandbox not in a live page. --Triwbe (talk) 16:50, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Neversayneversong.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Neversayneversong.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:48, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Before I Self Destruct.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Before I Self Destruct.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Das war doch nun wirklich geklärt

Die Diskussion bezügl J-Wave hatten wir doch schon:

Deine Bemühungen um die Brandy-Artikel sollen in allen Ehren gehalten werden; aber wie ich mit gut erinnere (und du auch deiner Talkpage entnehmen kannst), hatten (!) wir bereits geklärt, dass Mariah-Chart.com keine zulässige Quellenangabe ist. Des Weiteren sind die Tokio Hot 100 keine offiziellen Airplay-Charts, sondern die Airplay-Auflistungen des einzelnen (!) Radiosender J-Wave, d.h. sie sind nicht relevant für Wikipedia (ganz egal, ob die jetzt in anderen Artikeln aufgelistet sind! Du würdest ja auch nicht die Hit Radio FFH-Charts hier nicht posten) ... In diesem Sinne nehme ich die Änderungen wieder raus, okay? Danke, Noboyo

Ih werde deine edits enstprechend rückgängig machen, Danke. - Noboyo, September 26, 2008

Müssen wir das wirklich nochmal ausdisuktieren? - Noboyo

And again and again ...

It feels like we had 1000s of discussions about that but okay, once again:

Please, do not revert the Brandy discography article. With your revisions you are removing sourced content (singles information, sources about certification data of the CRIA and BPI etc.) ...

These are not important in an discography (only domestical sales plus international sales) that's it the rest can be looked up in the album's article. singles informations are not being removed anyways

Who say's this is not important?

Cuz otherwise SNEp or IFPI or whateva would all have to be part of the discography

So add it, whatever. Sorry, but you just can't invent guidelines for WP.

Who the hell says these are the guidelines?????????!!!!!!!

.......You: These are not important in an discography ... (cit.)

What I'm sayin don'tchu agree with me when i say its better to make the atricle quite plain and understandable for anybody with further detailed information featured on the album's article.

Please, do not add the Divas Live '99 to the discography. It's a live compilation album, including songs by various singers and is not considered canon of the Brandy discography as she appears on three tracks only. Thus, it is listed under the 'appearances' section.

The official Billboard charts credit the album as "Brandy", "Tina Turner", "Cher" and "Whitney Houston" so... forget it

Once again: You should not focus on singles sources!!

i didn't remove any source.

That's not what I said: You should not focus on singles sources!!

Whatchu mean by that i aint focusin' on any singles sources

You just can't say: Billboard says and that's it ...

of course the whole Wikipedia thang is based on sources. Who can tell better than billboard if the album should be counted as compilation or collaboration album It's obviously the latter.

Don't lnow who says Billboard is reliable, but is lists a lot of commercial stufff. But, please, think about it: Brandy appears on three songs on the album - and those are not even of original content.

Of course it is just 3 songs because it's a collaboration album. It's split 3 out of 12 is on quarte. 4 artits on album. Each gets to sing in about 3 or 4 songs. That makes sense.

It makes no sense as there's in not any new material on it's just no collaboration album. By the way: It hasn't even been released by Atlantic Records, Brandy former record label.

Your point on Brandy discography:

The video of "Stunt 101" features Brandy - not the song!
Brandy did many songs on which her background vocals appear but they should NOT be included on her singles discography.
"He Is" and "Angel in "Disguise" are singles! Check the sources on the "He Is" article page. (By the way: "Angel in Disguise" even appeard on the The Best of Brandy album.
R and B album hasn'T even been recorded so it should not be included on the discography page.

So He Is didnt receive a commercial CD release neither did Angel In Disguise. That is what counts not the fact that AID appeared on TBOB

A commercial CD single release does not qualify it for making it a single. It's a single, when its referred to as such.

How can U Tell R&B was recorde or not. This source fore example says, one of many sources by the way, that they are currently working on it. U really need to read the definition of "single" (see Single) becausea single is basicly the commercial release of a CD, cassette and or a digital download featuring a hit song.

Doesn't really matter if recorded or not. It's still unreleased (no date has even been mentioned) so it shouldn't be included on the albbum section ... its says Singles are distributed through a number of ways - and that's actually right, ieven if it's a legal (!) download single only.

If u think like that that why would you not include for example Turn it up as a single

Because it's never been adressed as a single! Right from the start is was always proclaimed as a "buzz track"!

"adressed" there is no need for it to be adressed. Either it is a commercial single or it isnt and it's not because no CD, no cassette, no download, no video, no nuthin. The same with AID, and HI.

there is no need for it to be adressed - of course it needs to. "He Is" just has been announced as a single and had a release date and a promotional CD single - with a cover!

Turn it up has a cover too. But it makes no sense. we need a resolution. So my proposal is Stunt 101 will leave, so do RIAA, CRIA, BPI. He Is and AID will be included on the singles table. The rest remains. is that good for ya???

I appreaciate the fact you wanna come to and end. But, to come back to where we started: VH1 Divas 99 is a compilation album, and R and B has not been released yet. tha albums are Brandy albums. R and Be already has a title and a tentative release date (spring/summer 2009). Human is also featured on the discography. The Divas CD is featured on almost every single discography who is featured in VH1D (Mariah Carey discography, Cher discography, Tina Turner discography, Whitney Houston discography and many more)

So remove Human, and you're correct!! ... It's listed on the pages, because YOU added them long time ago. Btw: It is listed on Brandy discography, but just not as of her albums (but in the appearances section)

Thank You - Noboyo

If I Were a Boy

If I Were a Boy does not meet the standards laid down in WP:NSONGS. Please do not undo the redirect until the single charts on multiple charts or has been covered by multiple artists.—Kww(talk) 18:57, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Beyonce - If I Were A Boy.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Beyonce - If I Were A Boy.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:17, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Beforeiselfdestruct.jpg

I have tagged Image:Beforeiselfdestruct.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Melesse (talk) 09:52, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Divas Live '99.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Divas Live '99.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:25, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Brandy - Brokenhearted.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Brandy - Brokenhearted.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:28, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Brandylive.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Brandylive.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:28, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Brandymase.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Brandymase.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:30, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:TURN IT UP.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:TURN IT UP.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:02, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brandytop.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Brandytop.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 23:17, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Right here cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Right here cover.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:24, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is considered undesirable because it splits the page history which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Oxymoron⁸³ 12:06, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to List of honorific titles in popular music. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — R ² 19:08, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Takin Back My Love.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Takin Back My Love.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:40, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Sarah Connor Takin Back My Love.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Sarah Connor Takin Back My Love.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 17:46, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Sarah Connor Takin Back My Love.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Sarah Connor Takin Back My Love.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 17:46, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Sarah Connor Takin Back My Love.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Sarah Connor Takin Back My Love.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 17:46, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Brandytour.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Brandytour.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:06, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:BrandyonTour.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BrandyonTour.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:07, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Never Say Never World Tour

A tag has been placed on Never Say Never World Tour requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. HJ Mitchell (talk) 18:43, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Waubrandy.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Waubrandy.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:32, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Almostdoesntcount.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Almostdoesntcount.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Brandy - Right Here (Departed) - German Cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Brandy - Right Here (Departed) - German Cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Brandy-Human-Deluxe-Edition.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:Brandy-Human-Deluxe-Edition.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:55, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Brandy's sixth studio album

I have nominated Brandy's sixth studio album, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandy's sixth studio album. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Tyrenon (talk) 04:43, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

You knew or should have known the actor's correct DoB, since you moved his bio to create the Dab.
--Jerzy•t 05:12, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Tiny Kong.PNG)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tiny Kong.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Feinoha ^{Talk, My master} 20:06, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Brandy - Human World Tour 2.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Brandy - Human World Tour 2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 02:21, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Waubrandy.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Waubrandy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 12:43, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Right here cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Right here cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 23:47, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello there great job on the Portal:Brandy... I have one concern, that is use of non-fair images are not allowed in portals...I will see if i can find some..I will not delete them but i cant stop others from removing the images!!!...Moxy (talk) 16:32, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have left a message for help here -->User talk:Leahtwosaints#Hello!!.........Moxy (talk) 16:37, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for warning me, but is it that they are just non-fair for the use in the Portal or are they non-fair in general, because the pictures are used in several other articles for years now.

Its odd but for some odd reason non-fair images are just not allowed in portals even if they are allowed in the article the portal links to. Why this is i have no clue..But there are a few editors thats that is all they do is deface Portal by deleting images and not taking the time to find and replace them..Moxy (talk) 17:04, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Brandy: Special Delivery

A tag has been placed on Brandy: Special Delivery, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Vox puppet (talk • contribs) 01:34, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion

I nominated that ridiculous article because the idea that a reality TV series would be made for MTV following the pregnancy of a total nobody is too nonsensical even for the heavily commercialised media industry of America, widely reckoned to be the most stupid of all Western nations. Clearly a hoax. Even if it's true, it doesn't deserve a place here, it's just not notable.--Vox puppet (talk • contribs) 02:19, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell, are you talking. This is as much a relevant TV-show, like the ones by The Osbournes, Britney Spears and Kevin Federline, Monica, Keyshia Cole, Fantasia, Ray J, The Kardashians, Diddy and many many countless others... And to call Brandy a nobody is just stupid, I am sorry. Malcolmo (talk) 02:27, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the nomination. I agree that Voxpuppet's nomination was completely inappropriate, and am discussing it with him.—Kww(talk) 03:02, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my God. I've just looked at all that crap to do with celeb reality TV and all I can say is thank God I don't live in America. You poor thing. I apologise, you've got enough crap in your life just being in a country that will put up with that rubbish. --Vox puppet (talk • contribs) 03:11, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page Move

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Der Schuh des Manitu, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. We have some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Valerius Myotis (talk) 07:08, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brandy and Ray J: A Family Business

Hi, it would be great if we could avoid quoting episode summaries on Brandy and Ray J: A Family Business. The problem is that now nearly 100 percent of the page is quotations, which is borderline on a copyright violation. We can certainly paraphrase, but copy-and-paste is a bad idea. Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:59, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Each Tear

Dear user, you apppear to be having trouble with understanding the nature of non-free images in the article Each Tear by Mary J. Blige. The policy for non-free content if found at WP:NFCC. It clearly states two conditions (#3, #8) which apply to this article:

non-free images must only be used where they enhance a reader's understanding of the article content
normally articles should only contain one' non-free image.

As the covers for the various versions of the single are similar with the same colour background and text the only the thing that changes is the superimposed image of the featured artist the additional covers cannot be justified. they do not add something which cannot be explained in text. I will replace the single cover with the international EP cover which uses just Mary J Blige in order to prevent bias. Please do not upload the other images again. If you have any questions please feel free to ask me. Regards, Lil-unique1 (talk) 16:30, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MJB-Each Tear with Tiziano Ferro.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MJB-Each Tear with Tiziano Ferro.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:18, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MJB-Each Tear with Rea Garvey.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MJB-Each Tear with Rea Garvey.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:27, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of The Brandy Star Profile

I have nominated The Brandy Star Profile, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Brandy Star Profile. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:31, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly Rowland discography

I have undone your edits for the following reasons:

At WP:record charts it clearly and specifically states that sources must be primary and licensed as well as clearly showing a song's chart positions. There is no source for the position 109 because it doesn't exist. The bubbling under charts should not be added on top of the regular Hot 100.
"Everywhere You Go" is a Kelly Rowland song (its in her chronology, on her website, in the media as her release) featuring Africa United therefore how can she be a featured artist on it?
"Shake Them Haterz" was never released, it was replaced by "Grown Woman" and "Rose Colored Glasses" as demonstrated on their article pages and at Kelly Rowland. Lil-unique1 (talk) 16:15, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sarah Connor Takin Back My Love.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sarah Connor Takin Back My Love.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:27, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Timbo with onerepublic.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Timbo with onerepublic.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:R. kelly skin.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:R. kelly skin.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:R. kelly i believe.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:R. kelly i believe.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:R. kelly supaman high.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:R. kelly supaman high.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:07, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:R. kelly - sign of a victory.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:R. kelly - sign of a victory.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:06, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:R. kelly playlist.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:R. kelly playlist.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:09, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:R kelly happy people.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:R kelly happy people.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Peripitus (Talk) 21:52, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:R kelly u saved me.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:R kelly u saved me.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brandy - Human World Tour.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brandy - Human World Tour.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:25, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brandy Human Tour 2.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brandy Human Tour 2.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 07:10, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Brandy, Ray J & Willie Norwood Talk To me.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Brandy, Ray J & Willie Norwood Talk To me.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 19:05, 16 April 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 19:05, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brandy, Ray J & Willie Norwood Talk To me.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brandy, Ray J & Willie Norwood Talk To me.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 08:21, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Moesha S1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Moesha S1.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Moesha S1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Moesha S1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:39, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of best selling music artists

Please refrain from inserting artists with unreliable sources and incorrect certified sales. At the List of best-selling music artists, we are to use highly reliable sources, preferably news services such as CNN, Fox News, The Washington Post etc.. As for Bet.com for R. Kelly, not only is it unreliable but it doesn't contain a sales figure. I have gone over R. Kelly's certified sales (which you can find here) and I'd like to inform you that your posted certified sales for every single market is incorrect. R. Kelly's total for U.S. market is 43.5 million including albums, singles, videos and duo collaborations. Please discuss your certified sales in details before editing the list.--Harout72 (talk) 00:02, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but Black Entertainment Television is surely a reliable source. It is one of the country's biggest networks. And the link clearly states "150 million". I will add R. Kelly to the list again. If I make any formal mistakes, I'd be thankful if one corrected them, instead of just deleting everything. Malcolmo (talk) 00:16, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No it is not reliable for that list, please look at all other sources supporting the sales figures of other artists, they are coming from prestigious news services. Please don't make me start issuing you warnings for disruptive editing.--Harout72 (talk) 00:26, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing

You might also want to familiarize yourself with the required percentages for certified sales which are posted in the second box from top at Talk:List of best-selling music artists. That said, R. Kelly has begun charting in 1992, which requires his claimed figures be supported by 38% certified sales. R. Kelly's available certified sales are 49.5 from all of the music markets combined; therefore, his claimed figure cannot be more than 130 million. In other words, R. Kelly can only be inserted into the List of best-selling music artists with 130 million claim.--Harout72 (talk) 00:26, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Racist? Please be careful with your language as it might very easily get you to WP:AN/I for such an accusation. Please follow the policy of the List of best-selling music artists. Your source does not have a sales figure within.--Harout72 (talk) 00:31, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eventhough I fail to realise, how one would consider BET to be non-reliable... I will add R. Kelly in the 50 million section based on another source. That of course if Time magazine is regarded to be reliable enough... http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1621217,00.html Malcolmo (talk) 00:42, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that will certainly do it, but make sure to use the certain sales here that I have retrieved with correct certification-levels for all other markets. Be sure not to post more than 43.4 for U.S. market as they all have to be verifiable.--Harout72 (talk) 00:47, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You forgot to include other collaborations like "Wonderful" by Ja Rule, "Be Careful" by Sparkle, "I'm Your Angel" with Céline Dion, "Hotel" by Cassidy, "Back & Forth" by Aaliyah etc. The album "Born Into The 90's" with Public Announcement and their four hit singles together. How should I handle that? Malcolmo (talk) 01:03, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We are to include certification of duo collaborations only. Collaborations of more than two artists should not be included in certified sales; therefore I left out "Wonderful" by Ja Rule featuring R. Kelly and Ashanti.

The collaboration album, Born into the '90s cannot be found in RIAA.
Sparkle has only one certification by RIAA, and it's the album Sparkle, no "Be Careful" can be found in the RIAA's database.
RIAA doesn't have any certifications for "I'm Your Angel" single by R. Kelly and Celine Dion.
"Hotel" by Cassidy cannot be found either in RIAA's database.
"Back & Forth" is a single by Aaliyah only, written by R. Kelly.

So, we're left with 43.4 million for the U.S.--Harout72 (talk) 01:24, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Public Announcement certifications

R. Kelly performs the rap in Aaliyah's "Back & Forth"

About "I'm Your Angel", "Hotel" I wasnt sure... So I guess they are uncertified, and I did not know about this rule regarding collaborations.

Malcolmo (talk) 01:36, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch on Born Into the 90's, I typed in Public Announcement and the database didn't bring up results for that. As for Aaliyah's "Back & Forth", I believe we should leave its certification out as R. Kelly doesn't seem to have been officially credited for his Rap performance. In other words, his name isn't even included on the cover of the single, nor is it included in RIAA's database for "Back & Forth". So that brings our U.S. total to 44.4 million including Born Into the 90's.--Harout72 (talk) 01:58, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MTV is highly reliable, Bet.com should not be compared to MTV. MTV is one of the fewest Music Industry related organizations that we consider reliable at List of best-selling music artists, Billboard Magazine and VH1 are considered reliable as well. If there are claimed figures by any of those organizations for R. Kelly or Toni Braxton, feel free to provide them. You can also post your desired sources at WP:RSN to get the folks on there to provide you with further explanation as to why such sources like Bet.com cannot be compared to sources like MTV.--Harout72 (talk) 01:07, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly differentiates MTV and VH1 from BET. I am intrigued to find out? Can you elaborate on that further? Malcolmo (talk) 05:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an expert in editorials, that's why I suggested above, that you asked the folks at WP:RSN as there are some knowledgeable editors on there who explain to you the difference between BET and MTV. However, when analyzing sales figures, I weigh the reliability of sources by putting artists' available certified sales into work. In the case of R. Kelly, the 150 million claim by BET is plain inflated, and honestly, I havn't seen neither MTV nor VH1 publish figures inflated by that scale. The 50 million in certified sales-which is what R. Kelly has-can translate into some 70 million in actual sales, considering that he's begun charting in 1992 and the music markets which generate 90% of the global sales in the world, did have certification systems established by then. BET could perhaps be used to support some statements, but again it's not widely acceptable as they don't seem to to use enough resources to get their information right (referring to the 150 million).--Harout72 (talk) 06:34, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dixie Kong.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dixie Kong.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:08, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KellyHereIAmUk.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KellyHereIAmUk.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:25, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Trapped in the Closet Chapters 1-12 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Zomba and Eric Lane

Trapped in the Closet Chapters 13-22 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Zomba and Eric Lane

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Angelindisguise.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Angelindisguise.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:36, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Moesha Season 1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Moesha Season 1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Noel "Detail" Fisher production discography

The article Noel "Detail" Fisher production discography has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Discographies are reserved for notable subjects who have a Wikipedia article. If a biography for the subject is not created this list should be deleted. As an aside the subject appears notable so the article should be written. If no action ensues this PROD, I will likely create the article myself. My76Strat (talk) 23:33, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. My76Strat (talk) 23:33, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Angel In Disguise Cover.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading File:Angel In Disguise Cover.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:13, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited True (Brandy song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strings (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Two Eleven

Hi,

Although I appreciate your enthusiasm for editing Two Eleven I have some issues with some of your recent edits:

firstly, you tried to add Warryn Campbell as a producer for "Scared of Beautiful", this edit is not supported by a reliable source.
Secondly you've added every single minor country to the release history for the album from iTunes. This simply isn't necessary. In reality there are only 3-4 different dates and with exception to Japan there are just two versions of the album. It is simply overkill and not required to list every single country on iTunes. Wikipedia isn't here to promote the album's release. The release history is simply to give a guide/flavour of when the album is out and where in the world. I removed all of the minor markets - i.e. countries where their share of the global music market is low. There is no intentional bias here nor is it an attempt to offend. It simply looks silly to have 1000s of release dates and over 40 iTunes references. Please DO NOT add back. Thanks. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 13:21, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How many other articles have an extensive release history as long? What purpose does it serve? If there were like ten different release dates and formats I would understand. But at the moment its just unnecessarily tedious. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 13:50, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

P.s. rather than edit war i've opened a discussion here → → → Talk:Two_Eleven#Release_dates — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 13:56, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Human World Tour for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Human World Tour is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human World Tour until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 16:05, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stargate (production team)

Hi. You've either edited Stargate (production team) or edited an article recently related to it. The article is currently up for a Good Article Review at Talk:Stargate (production team)/GA2. If you have time to assist in making changes so it can keep its GA status, that would be appreciated. :) --LauraHale (talk) 08:42, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Brandy Human Tour.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Brandy Human Tour.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:13, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article move

Please dont make unexplained article moves as you did to PBR&B. The sources cited in that article clearly refer to the topic as "PBR&B", so your move is clearly challengeable. If you want to make a potentially controversial move, refer to here. Dan56 (talk) 07:25, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dawn Richard discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Raydiation 2 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raydiation 2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raydiation 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Thebirdlover (talk) 05:33, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Branwithoutyou.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Branwithoutyou.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:35, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Branwithoutyou.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Branwithoutyou.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:26, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Willienorwoodibelieve.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Willienorwoodibelieve.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:00, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of artists influenced by Brandy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Brown (singer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. –Chase (talk / contribs) 02:27, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lieaboutusavantandnicole.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lieaboutusavantandnicole.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:28, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of artists influenced by Brandy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of artists influenced by Brandy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of artists influenced by Brandy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Chase (talk / contribs) 04:36, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Dawn Richard Blackheart.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dawn Richard Blackheart.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nottonight.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nottonight.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:38, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Malcolmo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Brandy Norwood

Portal:Brandy Norwood, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Brandy Norwood and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Brandy Norwood during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 02:32, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:R kelly in the kitchen.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:R kelly in the kitchen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]