User talk:Lomoraronald

Welcome

Hello, Lomoraronald, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 20:26, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

This is Lomoraronald's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Community Development center (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Community Development center and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Community Development center, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:26, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lomoraronald! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:26, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Lomoraronald

A tag has been placed on User:Lomoraronald requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:03, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User page

Sorry, but your user page does not conform to Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself and your Wikimedia-related activities. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
a workspace for a draft article
a personal website, blog, or social media site
a space for self-promotion or other advertising
a CV/resumé
a lengthy autobiography

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Thank you. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:03, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... ( I am an editor who is still practicing) --Lomoraronald (talk) 17:07, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please place your content in your user sandbox (User:Lomoraronald/sandbox) or use the draft article space. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:09, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yine Yenki Nyika (March 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yine Yenki Nyika and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yine Yenki Nyika, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv (talk) 16:05, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cecilia Oba has been accepted

Cecilia Oba, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Bilorv (talk) 16:57, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Lomoraronald, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Bilorv (talk) 16:58, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sarah Najjuma

Hello, Lomoraronald

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Majavah and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Sarah Najjuma, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Majavah}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Majavah ^(t/c) 13:24, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Catheline Ndamira for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Catheline Ndamira is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catheline Ndamira until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Legion Legion (talk) 13:13, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Rose Kirumira

Hello, Lomoraronald

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Amkgp and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Rose Kirumira, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rose Kirumira.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Amkgp}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Amkgp (talk) 14:12, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Judith Heard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Judith Heard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judith Heard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 14:26, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dianah Nabatanzi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dianah Nabatanzi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dianah Nabatanzi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 15:52, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Your addition to Dianah Nabatanzi has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 11:09, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky Mbabazi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lucky Mbabazi, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. creffett (talk) 13:52, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucky Mbabazi (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lucky Mbabazi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lucky Mbabazi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 07:57, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Camila Barungi

Hello, Lomoraronald,

Thank you for creating Camila Barungi.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Much is directly copied from https://reelabilities.org/newyork/guest/camilla-barungi/

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

North8000 (talk) 15:16, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Hi I’m just reviewing Julie Mukoda Zabwe. Thank you for creating this, and I hope you enjoy creating and working on other articles. All the best. Mccapra (talk) 11:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Afrie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Afrie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Afrie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 17:40, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Yine Yenki Nyika

Hello, Lomoraronald. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yine Yenki Nyika".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 13:57, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lual Mayen

Hello, Lomoraronald. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lual Mayen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Community Development center

Hello, Lomoraronald. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Community Development center".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:35, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lucky Mbabazi

Hello, Lomoraronald. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lucky Mbabazi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:48, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Your edit to Baratuku refugee settlement has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Sennecaster (Chat) 19:47, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of O-boy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on O-boy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —C.Fred (talk) 16:48, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jaiksana

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jaiksana requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —C.Fred (talk) 16:49, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Forestry in South Sudan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Forestry in South Sudan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.unep.org/explore-topics/disasters-conflicts/where-we-work/south-sudan/community-forestry and https://rainforests.mongabay.com/deforestation/2000/Sudan.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DanCherek (talk) 12:56, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your feedback! Lomoraronald (talk) 19:31, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lual D'Awol moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lual D'Awol, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 13:07, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

okay thanks, i will make sure i improve it Lomoraronald (talk) 19:31, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Woja Emmanuel Wani

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Woja Emmanuel Wani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:55, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dier Tong Ngor has been accepted

Dier Tong Ngor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 19:48, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Woja Emmanuel Wani

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Woja Emmanuel Wani, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PICKLEDICAE🥒 13:17, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lual D'Awol

Hello, Lomoraronald. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lual D'Awol, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of national cultural sites in South Sudan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of national cultural sites in South Sudan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.world-guides.com/africa/north-east-africa/south-sudan/south_sudan_landmarks.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:59, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Erjok Agot moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Erjok Agot. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and has neutral point of view concerns as well. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Tails Wx 15:03, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Juba Archaeological Sites moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Juba Archaeological Sites, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. // Timothy :: talk 12:38, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Monuments and Historic Sites of South sudan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Monuments and Historic Sites of South sudan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. // Timothy :: talk 12:41, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

HIV/AIDS in South Sudan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, HIV/AIDS in South Sudan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. // Timothy :: talk 12:44, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

South Sudan State House moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, South Sudan State House, J1, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. // Timothy :: talk 12:47, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Obij Aget for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Obij Aget is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obij Aget until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

// Timothy :: talk 17:38, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ajonye Paperture for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ajonye Paperture, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajonye Paperture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Erjok Agot

Hello, Lomoraronald. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Erjok Agot, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Monuments and Historic Sites of South sudan

Hello, Lomoraronald. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Monuments and Historic Sites of South sudan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:South Sudan State House, J1

Hello, Lomoraronald. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:South Sudan State House, J1, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:HIV/AIDS in South Sudan

Hello, Lomoraronald. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:HIV/AIDS in South Sudan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:HIV/AIDS in South Sudan

Hello, Lomoraronald. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "AIDS in South Sudan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as you did at Otuho people. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DanCherek (talk) 14:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lomoraronald (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Today I was training a couple of members on citations and adding references, and actually mistakenly published a copied part of the an article about the Otuho people, with an aim to actually tell my audience not to do that, but it got published, I am an organizer and trainer of various Wikimedia projects, I am very sorry this came up to this, but I mistakenly published the article, please revert the publication and please unblock my account since I use it a lot for trainings and for now I am the only to go person and leader of the Wikimedia community in south Sudan, I will appreciate if you help me, since I have to continue with the training tomorrow. Lomoraronald (talk) 19:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I've placed your statement within the unblock request as intended(it should replace the words "your reason here"). I am sorry that this affects your training of other Wikipedia editors, and I hope you can make a convincing unblock request soon, but this isn't it. It's not "likely" a copyright violation, it is a violation. Copyright violations potentially put Wikipedia in legal jeopardy, so we must be convinced that you understand the issues here before unblocking you. You don't need to tell us we can "block you forever"; no one wants to do that, we want you to understand what is going on here. 331dot (talk) 06:39, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If this was a one-off, I wouldn't have blocked. But your talk page shows a long history of copyright violations: warning in March 2020, warning in April 2020, another notice in April 2020, warning in October 2021, G12 speedy deletion in March 2022, G12 speedy deletion in September 2022. That's a staggering number of copyright warnings for an editor with only 141 edits. I also removed a copyright violation you added to Nakivale Refugee Settlement in September 2023, in addition to the one from today at Otuho people. It does not appear that any of the previous warnings have had an effect on your editing. So I'm sorry to say that I'm not quite convinced that you understand the issue here or that the problems wouldn't reoccur if you were unblocked. Please go through the copyright policy and formulate an unblock request that demonstrates an understanding of it, and a commitment to avoid copyright violations in the future. DanCherek (talk) 04:50, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, actually the other related violations were long ago when I was still starting to edit in Wikipedia, and yes, this was a way bigger mistake, I am not sure how I can convince you about this not happening again, but trust me, this I have read the policies, I actually train people on them now, and all I would request is an Unblock, I understand and admit my fault, and promise to never do it again, since I now better understand the policies, that copying material without the permission of the copyright holder from sources that are not public domain or compatibly licensed (unless it's a brief quotation used in accordance with Wikipedia's non-free content policy and guideline) is likely to be a copyright violation. Please and please this should never happen, we can agree and that after this if it happens just block me forever, please! I am in the middle of trying to work on our cultural programs in the country editing about our people in South Sudan, please. Lomoraronald (talk) 05:52, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lomoraronald (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unblock Request

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to request an unblock of my Wikipedia account, Lomoraronald. I fully understand the reasons behind the block, which was due to copyright violations, and I take full responsibility for my actions.

I now realize the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's copyright policy and the negative impact that violating these rules can have on the platform and its community. I have taken the time to thoroughly review Wikipedia's guidelines on copyright, particularly the necessity to ensure that all content added to Wikipedia must be either freely licensed or fall under the fair use doctrine. I am committed to strictly following these guidelines in the future.

To demonstrate my commitment to avoiding copyright violations going forward, I plan to:

Contribute Only Original Content or Properly Licensed Material: I will ensure that any content I add is either my own original work, or I have verified that it is properly licensed for use on Wikipedia. I will use tools like Wikimedia Commons for freely licensed images and ensure that text contributions are appropriately cited and licensed.
Thoroughly Cite Sources: I will provide proper citations for any information I contribute, ensuring that all sources are reliable and properly referenced, and that any direct quotations are clearly marked and attributed.
Engage with the Community: I will seek guidance from experienced editors and participate in discussions to ensure my contributions are compliant with Wikipedia’s policies. I will also make use of the Wikipedia Teahouse and other help forums when I am uncertain about the suitability of content.
Undergo Further Training: I will take advantage of available resources, such as Wikipedia’s tutorial on copyright and editing practices, to better understand the platform’s requirements and improve my contributions.

I deeply regret my previous mistakes and am dedicated to contributing positively to the Wikipedia community. I kindly ask for your understanding and an opportunity to demonstrate that I can abide by Wikipedia’s standards and contribute valuable content.

Thank you for considering my request.

Sincerely, Lomoraronald

Lomoraronald (talk) 16:35, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This reads like a chatbot wrote it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:25, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) Hello. I have been looking through unblock requests to check for any that may be AI generated. Your unblock request has come back as 73.02% AI generated on ZeroGPT. If you have used AI to make the unblock request, it will not work. We want to hear from you because you are the blocked user, not the AI. QwertyForest (talk) 15:06, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Juba Archaeological Sites

Hello, Lomoraronald. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Juba Archaeological Sites, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

{{unblock|1= Hello Dear Admins,

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Lomoraronald (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Dear Admins, After a while of careful reading and considerations I have finally come to understand the serious consequences my actions can cause as far as breaching Wikipedia's copyright policy, I had not properly understood it, I have come to notice that this can even lead to law suits where Wikipedia or even Wikimedia can be sued, I am so sorry for having broke this policy just as many other policies that I now fully understand, I deeply regret my actions and see for an unblock and make sure that from this time I fully commit to citing reliable sources, not copying content from such sources, I make sure that also focus on writing more accurate content on wikipedia, like doing more research on topics that I am interested in, and also making sure that I preach the same to the people I interact with, my lose taking of these policies is something i fully regret I also came to understand even other way amazing safeguarding policies like the General friendly space policy for our Wikimedia events, and how even beyond the editing we should treat each other with respect and professionalism, dear Admin, I have fully understood and I am asking please help Unblock me to continue my wikimedia Journey, thanks so Much Lomoraronald (talk) 20:25, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

See below. DanCherek (talk) 01:17, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DanCherek:, as blocking admin, do you have any input regarding the appeal? Does it adequately address any of your concerns regarding copyright?-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:56, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, thanks for the ping! Yes, I will unblock shortly given the sincere appeal. Lomoraronald, please be careful with editing going forward, and make sure that everything is written entirely in your own words. Historically, editors who have been blocked for a second time for copyright violations have found that the second block is much, much harder to successfully appeal. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia (and your patience), and welcome back. DanCherek (talk) 01:16, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so so much DanCherek Lomoraronald (talk) 07:34, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to review, DanCherek and welcome back Lomoraronald!-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 15:46, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Juba Archaeological Sites

Hello, Lomoraronald. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Juba Archaeological Sites".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:14, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Ugandan comedians moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of Ugandan comedians. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it isn't formatted well. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 02:03, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cool thanks, I realised that too, let me add more sources and then republish, thanks Lomoraronald (talk) 06:10, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]