User talk:Lisiate
Good idea! I will edit the page to add the reference. --America's Cup History Fan 02:45, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Hello Lisiate, Thanks for the words of encouragement! I read about Wikipedia in a book called, "The World is Flat" by Thomas Friedman. Cheers, --America's Cup History Fan 02:29, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Hello there Lisiate, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you ever need editing help visit Wikipedia:How does one edit a page and experiment at Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions. If yu have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. Cheers! --maveric149
- Well done on getting the 100,000th article, Lisiate! That's quite an honour. :) (See my talk page.) -- Oliver PEREIRA 04:07 Jan 21, 2003 (UTC)
- Congratulations from me, too!
- Your article is already featured on the German wikipedia's internal news page, and if you manage to find out the number of inhabitants of Hastings until 10am GMT, I'll also create a German article about it today :-P.
- Best regards from Singapore --zeno 04:11 Jan 21, 2003 (UTC)
Cheers for that, kind of flukey doing my old home town just in time really... Zeno, the current population (according to populations.com) is 59,432. I'll add this to the page now.
Hi, regarding your question on the deleting of information placed on wiki by banned user, the answer is simple. Their stuff is deleted. The bottom line is that for people like DW, Michael et al, their ability to participate is one of the main motivations they have for continually coming back. It is part of an ego trip on their behalf. From experience it has been found that the most effective way of getting the message through to them that they are not wanted is to systematically and thoroughly delete what they write. As long as their work remains it acts as a magnet for them to say 'look. You banned me and I still am here and you still have my articles'. In DW's case, his identities constantly come back to work on the same articles; indeed we can almost identify the lastest DW troll by watching which pages a 'new' user goes to and follow their usage of DW's style of writing.
It can be frustrating having to delete good material, but it is a small price to pay if it achieves the effect of getting rid of a particular multiple banned user. Remember once banned, a user has no right to return to contribute. In some cases these people return 5, 10, 15 times as 'new' illegal identities. While their content may be good (except in Michael's case where he deliberately puts in deliberate fiction among the fact) they cause chaos all around, threaten and bully users and almost bring wiki to a standstill. (DW is currently supposing taking me to court for defamation because I stood up to him, or rather his phoney identity Joe Canuck!) Unless Wiki can get rid of cancers like DW, Michael, Adam etc they will ultimately destroy wiki. That is no exagguration; DW downloaded hordes of probably copyright images, all of which could have got wiki into serious legal troubles that might have required its shutdown, while Michael used the name of a rock band member as part of his vandalism, again opening up the prospect of possible legal action by that rock band member for defamation (he didn't just use the name but claimed to be that man!), and indeed by some rockbands he pretended to be. While deleting text has not stopped DW and Michael yet, Michael is now much less trouble and by going ballistic when he finds his stuff has been dumped, he makes himself instantly recognisable. It is an unfortunate but necessary way of bringing these characters under control and clearly and unambiguously sending an unambiguous message to them from wikipedia to f*** off, in the knowledge that all the hours they spend on wiki are wasted as everything they do is reverted, deleted or dumped en masse. Hopefully (eventually!) the futility of their coming back to wiki will sink in. FearÉIREANN 23:31 2 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Lisiate, thanks for your encouragement. When I started I knew very little about the Maori Wars either apart from the first one, we lived near one to the battlefields so it was unavoidable, but I have been reading and digesting and trying to make sense of the different accounts. In many ways it is quite painful, Being an ex pom I am very proud of New Zealand but it is hard to be of things like the Invasion of the Waikato. So it has been a real learning experience
Cheers Ping 08:24 30 Jun 2003 (UTC)
Thanks for the help. I was about to email you to ask about Utu. I can only remember it vaguely and the scene I do remember seems to relate more to Volkner's murder rather than Te Kooti, perhaps the Director took a very flexible view of NZ history. Any help is appreciated. Ping 09:22 14 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Let's wait until one of us has seen the movie again, for me it was twenty year ago so it is very vague. Ping 09:30 14 Jul 2003 (UTC)
People editing in the Maori Wikipedia - http://mi.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=HomePage - are encouraged to add the following (which appears THERE with macrons, not ASCII) to the top and bottom of each page (until we can organise something equivalent that sits outside the text box - hint, ANYBODY, PLEASE?):<!-- copy from these: Ā ā Ē ē Ī ī Ō ō Ū ū (and add this whole "hidden comment" to top and bottom of new pages) -->
- Robin Patterson 06:16, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- I've now added an editing bar that sits just below the Maori WP's edit box; Lisiate, you may move this whole contribution to your Talk page if you like. (But I hope you have a look at the current state of the Maori version while you are at it - over 40 articles written by someone who barely understands any of the language!) Robin Patterson 03:16, 18 May 2004 (UTC)
Maori TV is saying it's going to show "Utu" soon. :Robin Patterson 22:39, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)
I saw it last night, and the first scene was apparently set in 1870 so it's probably too late to be based on Te Kooti, still a good watch though. Lisiate 22:39, 18 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Dear Lisiate, i have a present for you:
Have fun! Muriel Gottrop 11:18, 7 Aug 2003 (UTC)
Dear Lisiate, it's always nice to know that i'm an inspiration, particulary on Roman affairs: a topic that tends to bore to death all my family and friends. I just posted another legion - Legio III Augusta. I'm going on wonderfull holidays :) tomorrow. In the meantime if you find something interesting let me know. I'm planning a list of Roman civil wars and rebellions. What about that? Cheers, Muriel Gottrop 18:06, 8 Aug 2003 (UTC)
Thanks for the recent disambiguation. I'm sure we will meet again here from time to time.
- robinp 21:27, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Yes, less than 2 months later! (I'm glad you saw UTU too.) Thanks for the ideas about where to seek help on boilerplate matters. I dropped it into your macrons paragraphs in case some kind soul EITHER interested in macrons OR scanning the "Recent Changes" might jump in and offer. I know very little about doing things outside the textboxes; but "they" made me a sysop on the "mi:" (bringing the number to 4) and I've poked around a bit. No hurry for this one - my top-and-bottom system works fine for me. Kind regards (and don't forget to keep an eye on New Zealand matters!) - Robin Patterson 01:12, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Hi Lisiate, I noted you VfD tagged New zealand cycling history which I think would be better speedy deleted. Have a look at Kennett Bros too. Looks like this anon may be deliberately getting some free advertising. It should be a speedy too IMMHO. Moriori 23:49, Oct 5, 2004 (UTC)
- I've added some wikification after the original submitter cleaned it up a bit. It still needs work, but I'd like to ask you to give it another read and reconsider your vote. Articles that need work aren't neccesarily deletion material. Thanks for your time.
Thanks for the compliment! I've been meaning to put the entry into press coverage if someone else didn't, so I'm glad you've gone ahead and done so. Cheers. Fuzheado | Talk 01:01, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Do I know you?
[edit]Hello Lisiate - I'm wondering if you're someone I know in the real (non web) world... I've just looked at the article on Julius Vogel, which mentions that the NZ science fiction awards are named in his honour. I helped to set up those awards, and didn't know that they had much publicity outside fandom. So, either they have or... do I know you?
James Grutness 00:27, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Thanks for your comment about my New Zealand-related articles — it's nice to know that people are reading and appreciating them. -- Vardion 07:01, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Article Licensing
[edit]Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
- Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
- Multi-Licensing Guide
- Free the Rambot Articles Project
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
- Option 1
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
OR
- Option 2
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)
Thanks for your kind words here[1] especially as I see you are actually from New Zealand (I've never been there). I was hoping it might make it onto the front page, but looking at the recent objections that now seems unlikely. It would have been nice to see some NZ culture there (albeit not indigenous) to balance the European. The objectors want it made longer, and I've written all I know on the subject, I think its long enough anyway, what's the point of waffling for ages. Thanks - see you around. Giano 09:03, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks for your last comments, all we need now is the All Blacks to come out on side. Giano 22:21, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Antarctic krill
[edit]hallo Lisiate - thank you for promoting my most beloved mystic critter - best greetings to downunder Uwe Kils 23:47, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)
Ted Radcliffe FAC
[edit]Hi Lisiate: Thanks for your helpful comment at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ted Radcliffe. I have addressed it. Did I catch them all (except in the lead where I wish to emphasise the use of his nickname)? —Theo (Talk) 11:17, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
Thank you for the support. The example that you changed was the lead emphasis to which I referred. However, I strenuously avoid reversion and I can think of no more convincing argument than "I liked it as it was", which is not enough! —Theo (Talk) 21:15, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
Category:Wikipedians in New Zealand
[edit]Hi, You might want to consider adding {{User NZ res}} to the top of your user page, which will add you to this category automatically and also add a nice graphic. Onco_p53 07:43, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
the walking game
[edit]i did not appreciate your comments "ok i laughed" in regards to my heartfelt statement in the walking game discussion page. What kind of heart do you have to laugh at a desperate plea like that....
- I was referring to the article not your piece anon. I just suggested the article go to BJAODN. Mind you, your rather overwrought "desperate plea" did raise a giggle though. Lisiate 03:19, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
I'm creating this portal as we type. I'm glad you found it. Any kiwi related rugby stuff is all yours for the posting.
Cheers,
Rowlan 02:34, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
No, I wasn't offended...it was a bit green, wasn't it? As far as contributions, have at it. I've decided to make the Rugby portal void of union and league and am creating a seperate union and league portals. Therefore the Rugby Portal is the gateway to it's two branches...a real organization for we rugbypedians.
Rowlan 00:06, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
New Zealand portal
[edit]An article you made a major contribution to, Michael Joseph Savage, is currently the selected article on the New Zealand portal. You're welcome to nominate other articles at Portal_talk:New_Zealand#Selected_articles, or to view the archive of selected articles at the article archive.-gadfium 05:46, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
As you may know, the Template:RugbyPortal which can be seen at the top of the Portal:Rugby has been nominated for deletion. I need backup to keep it alive, and keep the Rugby Portal looking as nice and well presented as possible. The idea behind the Portal itself is to bring more visible attention to Rugby related articles, and hopefully get nominated as a featured portal or something like that. Please vote to save this template. Go to Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:RugbyPortal and vote KEEP. Cheers, Rowlan 15:23, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
Auckland meetup
[edit]Just to let you know that a meetup is planned in Auckland for the 25th of June (see Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland for more details), and that you are cordially invited. GeorgeStepanek\talk 00:21, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
USS Gato
[edit]Kia ora!
- "USS Gato (SS-212) was ... named for the gato, a species of small catshark found in waters along the west coast of Mexico."
Better? —wwoods 08:06, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 05:37, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Flashman and the Dragon
[edit]Thanks for making that fix. --Joelmills 05:00, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Thoroughbred Racing
[edit]Hi Lisiate, I notice your contributions to the Makybe Diva article and would hazard a guess that you are interested in horse racing. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Thoroughbred racing is in its early stages and looking to recruit. i was sondering if you would be interested in contributing. Cheers. (dark horse 23:54, 6 July 2006 (UTC))
I have put in a requested move for the above article to be returned to its original name Tri Nations Series. As you have voted in previous move requests, I thought you might like the chance to vote.
You can vote here.GordyB 14:14, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Battle of Inkerman
[edit]Lisiate:
Are you interested in a Battle of Inkerman rewrite? I am a Crimean War enthusiast, and have read various descriptions of the battle written by the Allies and the Russians. I'm familiar with the timeline of what happened, what the maps looked like, the controversies, the statistics, etc.
If the original author is willing, I would be interested in rewriting the article. I don't however wish to rewrite it if that person would take offense at having their work revised...hence I would need their permission to proceed.
McClellan's account of the battle, as I recall, was excellent from the persective of describing how the three Russian attack columns were mismanuevered by their commanding officers, becoming hopelessly enmeshed with each other and losing their offensive sting. Aside from this, though, McClellan's account doesn't give us much of value.
Contact me for more on this if you're interested.
Regards, Kenmore 16:36, 16 October 2006 (UTC)kenmore
Auckland Meetup 2 Scheduled - Feb 10 2007
[edit]You are all invited to Auckland Meetup 2 on the afternoon of Saturday February 10th 2007 at Galbraith's Ale House in Mt Eden. Please see Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland 2 for details. You can also bookmark Wikipedia:Meetup/Auckland to be informed of future NZ meetups. - SimonLyall 05:41, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Camborne, Malaysia
[edit]No, the Camborne I'm from is not part of Malaysia. This Camborne refers to the one in Wellington. I just aspire to live in Malaysia so I put myself down as Malaysian. Citikiwi 04:16, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Rugby union national team Improvement Drive
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/46/Ru_ball.svg/48px-Ru_ball.svg.png)
We need your help! Here is what you can do:
- Adopt a national rugby union team article and collaborate with other members to improve it.
- Find, create and upload free images that will help improve these articles.
- Copy-edit, reference, and expand articles when and where you can.
- Promote the project and encourage others to join.
The World Cup is fast approaching and these articles are going to get a lot more hits during the tournament. It would be great if we could have them at a high standard!
For more information see the discussion on the WikiProject Rugby union talk page here.
Shudde talk 05:18, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Taifarious1 09:48, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Dabic website
[edit]http://dragandabic.com is fake as it was created today. The real one is http://www.psy-help-energy.com. --Avala (talk) 01:25, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit]Thanks for the comment re: NZ radio. I have not heard the segment myself, but glad to hear it made it on! -- Fuzheado | Talk 15:11, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
super rugby
[edit]Hello, i would like to inform of a discussion on in the WikiProject Rugby Union discussion page about the format to be used through the season articles of the super 12, super 14 and super rugby seasons. Please click the link below and have your opinion, thank you. JaFa 01 (talk) 05:25, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Link: Discussion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Imperial British Conservative Party has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Not a notable joke party.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JDDJS (talk) 23:08, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Imperial British Conservative Party for deletion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Imperial British Conservative Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imperial British Conservative Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JDDJS (talk) 00:25, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Lisiate. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Lisiate. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Lisiate. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Lisiate. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/20/Wikimedia-Meetup-GoldenBay-Mohua-v2_05.jpg/400px-Wikimedia-Meetup-GoldenBay-Mohua-v2_05.jpg)
Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.
Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.
Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the invite! Unfortunately I won't be able to attend due to work and family commitments but I hope you all have a great time. And I will try and get more active on the site, Lisiate (talk) 21:12, 13 November 2023 (UTC)