User talk:Lewishhh

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michelle Zauner (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Japanese Breakfast instead.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Japanese Breakfast. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is a request to spin off an article. Proposals to spin out a topic from an article into another stand-alone article should be discussed at the talk page of the existing article, unless the draft satisfies a special notability guide. If the draft satisfies a special notability guide, please identify the notability criterion with a reliable source. This does not mean that the draft should be spun off, and it does not mean that the draft should not be spun off. It does mean that discussion should be on the talk page of the existing article, Talk:Japanese Breakfast. (If this draft is resubmitted without discussion on the talk page of the existing article and does not satisfy a special notability guide, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michelle Zauner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Michelle Zauner, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:43, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lewishhh! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:43, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cheerbleederz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cheerbleederz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheerbleederz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 14:51, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cheerbleederz

Hello, Lewishhh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cheerbleederz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 05:48, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

==

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ==

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Prwl2000 (talk) 12:50, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at noticeboard of discussion regarding reason for discussion. The thread is thread name of the discussion. The discussion is about the topic Topic. Thank you.

{{subst:ANI-notice|Dream Nails|noticeboard=noticeboard of discussion|reason=reason for discussion|thread=thread name of the discussion}} Prwl2000 (talk) 14:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

FYI, I reverted your edit to 2024 United Kingdom riots as it appears to have been copied verbatim from https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cy8497l7dx8t?post=asset%3A5ba0d60f-5668-4548-8949-f36db02f0517.

You may wish to read up on Wikipedia copyright policies here.

Celjski Grad (talk) 14:53, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I need an explanation for you addition of text that is not in the source you used

Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2024 United Kingdom riots, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please show me where this edit[1] is backed by the source [2] Doug Weller talk 07:02, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dougweller I think you have misidentified and removed the latest source. From the actual source: "In Blackpool, protesters faced off against punks attending Rebellion Festival. There was little police presence as skirmishes broke out between the two groups, with bottles and chairs thrown" Lewishhh (talk) 07:23, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Besides the fact I don't sees the word stand-off, that doesn't seem to be the source you used. The source I see is [3]/ See this version with your edit. Am I missing something? Anyway, unblocking as you have responded. Doug Weller talk 08:22, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cl7yy2zevy2o this article mentions a stand-off, as well as chairs and bottles, and is linked by the original source. Everything has moved quite quickly with that page but I can only think I made a mistake and meant to use the above as a source. Lewishhh (talk) 09:04, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Lewishhh We all make mistakes. Go ahead and readd it with the new source, but I'd appreciate it if you made it clear the early source was the wrong source. Doug Weller talk 10:46, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for No responses to talk page warnings, etc, only deletions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 07:07, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is because your only edits to your talk page have been to delete large chunks, never responding. This is unacceptable as Wikipedia cannot work without collaboration. If you agree to start responding AND give me a satisfactory answr to my question, I'll unblock you. Doug Weller talk 07:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked. Doug Weller talk 08:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Falcon, Camden moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The Falcon, Camden. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back.

If you have any questions, you can reach me by replying to this comment and starting your message with {{Re|Wibbit23}} and ending your message with ~~~~. Thanks! Wibbit23 (talk) 04:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amersham Arms, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Wiley and Benga.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Lexington, Islington, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LP.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Queen's Head, Brixton, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Circa and London Museum.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:First Timers bands has been nominated for deletion

Category:First Timers bands has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 15:38, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]